Depends on definition of growth.

Financial or profit - no. Scientific advancement, efficiency, social growth or curiosity should absolutely grow. Unfortunately profit is winning out.

But muh' capitalism!

You would think an actually advanced civilisation would find some way to regulate itself to avoid cooking their home planet (as opposed to our current civilisation, I guess).

Yup. If they’re making combustibles out of our layer in 200 million years, I wonder if it’ll release forever chemicals

It shouldn't be because an intelligent civilization can theoretically easily avoid this.

Even our own, for all the doom and gloom we are switching now rapidly to low carbon energy production. Solar and Wins installation is being adopted faster than any energy source in history. And later down the line we would move energy intensive processes off world either into orbit or to other parts of the solar system to preserve our environment.

The great filter would need to be something unavoidable or insurmountable.

Renewability just means that the source isn't depleted (or is depleted slower) as it's used.

Like fossil fuels, that aren't being produced, so they'll eventually run out. But (in theory) trees are able to be planted and grown while other trees are used as a resource. Using either of them as an energy source produces heat that wouldn't be there with the resources left in place and unused.

Even "carbon neutral" fuel sources that don't emit greenhouse gasses still produce heat at some point between energy generation and energy usage.

Some energy sources just move heat around (like geothermal), but it moves it faster than the world would be able to balance out if it wasn't being used to power the civilization that's using it.

The last time I took a class that discussed this, the professor said that it's all about waste heat on the simplest level. We burn coal to make electricity, the heat of that heats water that spins turbines, but part of that heat gets released as the water cools. Then, that electricity is used for something like a light, which can only do so much about heat being produced along with the visible light.

It doesn't matter what you plug in as the fuel source. It can be nuclear, biomass, wind, solar, whatever. At some point along the way, no matter how little heat the electric generation produces, using that power to do work generates heat.

Even in an ideal form of power transmission, the end use is going to at least partially generate heat. Motors will have heat as a byproduct of movement, lights will produce some degree of heat, cooking is done by heat. Everything we do generates more than would be there otherwise, even if we went back to stone tools and a nomadic lifestyle, though at that level, you aren't producing more than the world can balance out. Just the making of stone tools makes more heat than using nothing but the teeth and claws other animals use.