this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
153 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

State and local election officials from across the country on Wednesday warned that problems with the nation’s mail delivery system threaten to disenfranchise voters in the upcoming presidential election, telling the head of the U.S. Postal Service that it hasn’t fixed persistent deficiencies.

In an alarming letter, the officials said that over the past year, including the just-concluded primary season, mailed ballots that were postmarked on time were received by local election offices days after the deadline to be counted. They also noted that properly addressed election mail was being returned to them as undeliverable, a problem that could automatically send voters to inactive status through no fault of their own, potentially creating chaos when those voters show up to cast a ballot.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bec@lemmy.nz 73 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Associated Press chooses not to discuss the small fact that DeJoy was appointed to destroy the USPS.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can we impeach of postmaster general?

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

The Board of Governors can remove the Postmaster General with a vote.

USC Title 39, Section 202: "(c) The Governors shall appoint and shall have the power to remove the Postmaster General, who shall be a voting member of the Board. His pay and term of service shall be fixed by the Governors."

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

If you have the option, fill out the mail in ballot at home, but then bring it into an official ballot drop off location.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (3 children)

By design. Why Biden didn’t oust Louis Dejoy I will never understand.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you elaborate or just meme?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I can, I just prefer people that make dumb AF posts to back them up. That's all.

After reading through that article, I want to highlight this particular paragraph...

"The U.S. Postal Service Board of Governors has sole authority to hire and fire the postmaster general, the highest position in the organization. Though pressure mounts from Democrats and watchdogs to remove DeJoy from his seat at the top of the agency, Biden lacks the power to do so."

Now maybe in misinterpreting this, but I think it says Biden can't remove him.

So I guess it is just meming without elaboration. Glad we could clear that up

He does now though: “Official act, fuck you.” (per Trump v. United States, No. 23-939)

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And yet he has, and has had, the power to appoint governors to directly fix the problem.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying he doesn't have the power to remove DeJoy? Got it

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sorry about your reading comprehension

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One of us made a verifiably false statement. And it wasn't me.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So, an actual answer if you're interested.

No, the President does not have the power to remove him. When the Post Office was reformed into USPS in the 1970's, the selection of Postmaster General is made by the Board of Governors of the Postal Service. These board members have 7 year terms, and are appointed by the President, with Senate approval.

The Postmaster General has no fixed term, and serves until the Board decides otherwise.

There are 9 members of the Board, and no more than 5 can be from the same party. The Postmaster General and Deputy Postmaster General are also voting members of the Board, though there are some things they can't vote on.

Removing requires an absolute majority - so even though a quorum is 6, there needs to be 5 votes to remove DeJoy.

No member of the Board can serve more than 2 terms, and they can't be removed without a gross violation - misconduct for example.

So despite the spongebob meme reference reply near mine, no, Biden can't just remove DeJoy.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the reply. I’m pretty sure I read that some of the board has already been replaced by Biden, but it sounds like it’s still not enough to oust this jackass. What a mess.

I think it’s pretty fucking clear that letting a postmaster general intentionally destroy and disrupt the USPS is a gross violation and obvious misconduct. It’s like if I just started deleting repos and databases and service clusters and backups at my job. I’d be fired for cause immediately. The fact that they don’t means they must be on the take, in one way or another.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

there needs to be 5 votes to remove DeJoy.

Five Biden appointees are now serving on the board, and have been since 2022. If Biden wanted DeJoy gone, he would be gone because Biden would've picked appointees who opposed him. Clearly, that didn't happen, so clearly, Biden doesn't actually care as much as we want him to.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

We have a bingo

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I don't think people are being duped, they just don't understand the concept of shifting the Overton window.

This ratcheting image is way easier for mechanically inclined people to understand. Hope it catches on.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 30 points 2 months ago

This is by design. The Republicans have been working on this since the last election.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago

De-ratfucking everything that Dejoy did should have been a priority for this administration on day one.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In Washington State (where most voting is done by mail) it doesn't matter when officials receive your ballot, all that matters is that it's postmarked by election day. This does mean that any race that's even remotely close can take days to call (as ballots continue to arrive days after election day), but you never have to worry about how long the post office is going to take to get your ballot delivered.

In neighboring Oregon on the other hand (also primarily mail-in voting) they won't count your ballot if it's not received by election day, so every election they have to throw out stacks of otherwise legitimate ballots just because the voter either underestimated how long it would take for them to arrive, or because all they heard was "XX is election day" and didn't know to consider mailing time.

I think Washington's system is superior, and should be how it's done everywhere. Washington also has same-day registration for the super-procrastinators! Literally no excuse to not vote here.

[–] don@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Fellow Washingtonian, transplanted from the opposite coast, can confirm our voting system is outstanding.

Still absolutely baffled and kinda furious that Biden has been content to continue letting DeJoy shit all over the USPS and actively prevent it from delivering and returning ballots in a timely manner all over the fucking country. Like seriously, for fuck’s sake, DeJoy is a fox in the henhouse, and he’s been having chicken fuckin’ dinner for four fucking years. Fucking DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. CHRIST.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a Good Thing Biden dealt with the Culprit behind all this- Dejoy! By letting him Keep his Job with no Investigations into his Conflicts whatsoever!

[–] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Biden doesn't have the authority to remove him

What's with the strange random capitalizations

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Biden has appointed the majority of the postal board at this point. If he wanted DeJoy gone, he'd be gone.

He chose to appoint more DeJoy supporters instead.

Edit: some folks are butthurt and downvoting facts. The fact is that five of the nine presidential appointees on the USPS board have been Biden picks since 2022, and he's made two more nominations two months ago that haven't been confirmed yet. The fact is that DeJoy only persists because Biden appointees Anton Hajjar, Amber McReynolds, Ron Stroman, Dan Tangherlini, and Derek Kan apparently approve of him.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I hope that is fixed. I voted by mail before.