this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
155 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

60336 readers
4671 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kr0n@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s not a bug. It was a feature. So, there is no fix, there is a change.

[–] RampageDon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Can't wait for the user base to not realize this, make an account, dislike and delete it and nuke their insta in the process

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it's the same account. I don't really understand the backlash, it's like saying you can't delete your gmail account without deleting your google drive account

[–] dirkgentle@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think a big difference is that an unused Google Drive it has no impact on you, so most people don't have a good reason to want to close it. Whereas people open and close social media accounts all the time (for personal and social reasons alike).

Also, afaik you can create Threads profiles without Instagram, so conceptually they are separare from the start. You are effectively penalizing Instagram users.

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

I think you can deactivate your Threads profile, at which point it wouldn't really have an impact on you (I'm not sure, I don't actually use Threads or Instagram). And they're very clearly branding Threads as "an Instagram app", so the fact that it uses an Instagram account isn't too surprising. Having two separate accounts could work too, but at the moment it doesn't really seem unexpected or detrimental that they're the same account.

[–] fbievan@fedia.io 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

they are actaully fixing that? So is it ta bug?

[–] kat@feddit.de 24 points 2 years ago

Maybe they were testing the waters first. Now that there is backlash, it was a "bug".

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Meta working quickly on the fix

They’ll fix it so it deletes your facebook account too?

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wait, there's an easy way for me to delete my Instagram account? Usually it's a pain in the ass

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They still have all your data, don't worry

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Opposite problem for me. I had a perfectly legitimate Instagram account that I used fairly infrequently to post pictures of artistic landscapes I saw in my daily life going back to like 2013. A few months ago, I tried to go on Instagram to be told that my Instagram had been deleted for "suspicious activity". There was an appeals process where they had me take a picture of myself holding a code they gave me, so I did, but they never got back to me and my account was completely gone like a day later. Apparently they don't have any fucking support staff, so there was absolutely no way for me to fight this. Their entire support team is automated. So yeah, years of special memories I had thrown down the drain. Fuck Meta. I refuse to store my memories on any of their bullshit platforms anymore since apparently they can just be deleted willy nilly like that. My IG account was even attached to my FB account, so I have no idea why the fuck they would just delete one account like that.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago

Wow. That's a pretty aggressive sales technique...

[–] kill_dash_nine@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a solid feature to me.

[–] d4rknusw1ld@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Threads wasn’t done. Clearly open beta farming algorithms. If it had a follower/followed tab in chronological order it would actually be a really good app.

[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They also clearly intended for activitypub to be a big part of the experience but also straight up said that they couldn't get it done in time. Its a rush job.

[–] d4rknusw1ld@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Well they rushed it out because of Twitter. It was a smart move. It’s clearly still in beta though. I think with just a followed/follower tab could make threads actually pretty enjoyable experience. Like a Reddit instagram Twitter all mixed into one. I’m usually a massive meta hater… but I enjoy threads.

I also would prefer Lemmy to be the lone survivor of this social media war. Cause Lemmy is awesome.

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

fixing that "bug" will chop # of threads users massively

[–] throws_lemy@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Meta itself is a bug, even zuck is the godfather all of bugs

[–] Neon@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

But Lizards eat bugs, no?

[–] C0mpu73rz0mbi3@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Wasn't there a post not too long ago that it said this in the TOS of Threads? Why is this a surprise?

[–] solarzones@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah I don’t think that was a mistake