this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
192 points (96.2% liked)

Videos

5689 readers
8 users here now

Neat vids from youtube or wherever. Rules later

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 128 points 1 year ago (4 children)

...and now they're in a shelter in place because of *checks notes unexpected rain, unusual climate change related weather.

One of the least climate friendly events out there but they go thinking they're pro nature and pro earth

[–] cdf12345@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Man the entitlement from the burners in this video is embarrassing AF.

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s almost like the hippies had a fucking point

[–] foo@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

The hippies became boomers

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Earthbenders stay winning.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Damn, y’all pollute everything with your large lame meaningless emotes. Maybe your favorite podcast can do a twitch steam, and you guys can do that over there.

[–] mawkler@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 year ago (8 children)

attack the big corporations instead

That's the problem though. How do you even do that?

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Like this

On December 10th, at around 6 p.m., 200 environmental activists suddenly stormed and “invaded” a Lafarge company cement factory of La Malle in Bouc-Bel-Air in the Bouches-du-Rhone, Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region in Southern France. Infrastructure at the plant was reportedly attacked using a variety of methods, including: sabotage of incinerators and electrical systems and devices; cable cutting; bags of cement cut open and spilled; damage to vehicles and construction equipment; damaged windows; and graffiti spraying.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yep, don't remember who it was that I heard say something along the line of "If climate activists were really convinced they want to end the system that they can't deny is profitable to them, car dealerships wouldn't be able to have SUVs on their lot as they would be set on fire during the night, airports would get vandalized, gas stations blown up..."

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

They are quite serious. you may not agree with their tactics. none the less they are the ones putting themselves out there.

I do agree with you on some points. when I lived in Berlin their were people making gentrification difficult by placing small firelighters under the wheels of expensive cars on the streets.

Which would make no news, because it can be hidden away (as few people are affected by it), while landing the protestors in jail for ages due to destruction of private property.

In conclusion, unless it's a mass action by a significant percentage of the population, it would have little effect.

[–] Helix@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I burn down an SUV, will this create less or more pollution than if it's driven and totalled after 80000km?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it means companies stop making them, in the long run it's a win for you.

[–] Helix@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

The only thing that is happening will be the company being able to sell another one. There should be tax incentives to not drive SUVs like taxing by weight and motor power. The SUV was initially loved because of tax exemptions for 'light trucks' in the USA.

[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does this actually do anything though? Insurance will just pay out and they'll maybe have slightly higher rates.

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Loss of factory working days is a huge loss. Additionally, the more likely this is to happen, the more expensive said insurance will become, or insurers will just stop offering insurance.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

No. Such insurances are mandatory by law; in extremis, a government agency would force an insurance to take the risk.

What will sooner happen is the factory installing higher and thoughervfences, install security cameras, keep dogs on th grounds and hire security.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I've never heard of insurance for large scale projects which can lose tends of thousands to millions of dollars per operations day lost. That's normally eaten by the company's savings or loans. Maybe it's different in France.

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Now this is what I LOVE to see. Take a note, road blockers.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idiotic.

  1. All that shit is insured

  2. The people doing this, if they get caught get massive fines and jail.

  3. Nothing changes


France has a democratic system. You want to make actual change, get involved in politics.

This highschool vandalism bullshit accomplishes nothing, except make environmentalist look like lunatics.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it's done enough, projects get delayed, profit is lost and insurance costs sky rocket.

Real politics is something you get invited to, not involved in.

No matter what climate activist do, they get shit on by people like you because big oil tells you what they do is bad. Stop being part of the problem.

[–] WhyEssEff@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Fuckass@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With violence. How else do you ‘attack’ something. This is the US, I’m sure you can imagine how one would do this.

[–] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Build an even bigger corporation?

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You stop buy their products

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Individual action within the rules of capitalism will never be enough to actually get stuff done. @punkisundead@slrpnk.net has the right idea here. If you want to actually hinder the corporations, you need to make it impossible to stay in business, no matter how they influence the government and rig the system in their favor.

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 year ago

Individual action is what spin everything to begin with, don't downplay it. If you teach everyone good ethics these companies are over in 24h

[–] JimmyChanga@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Their headquarters aren't hard to find

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago

All those SUVs and people cant drive off road... Also quite telling what kind of people are going to burning men in what kind of cars, in regards to its supposed spirit and culture...

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I watched with no audio, but was there something that made it appropriate for the ranger to pull a gun on those protesters?

I don't know that blocking a road like an asshat merits deadly force.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm well aware. Just surprised no one else mentioned it, figured I missed something.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Holy shit those YouTube comments are disgusting. Fuck these burner fucks and their $100k glamping vans.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Real, "Are we the baddies?", moment.