this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
41 points (95.6% liked)

Firefox

18073 readers
1273 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am currently a LibreWolf user, but I am also aware of Arkenfox User.js, which I am led to believe offers similar features.

Which is better?

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think arkenfox is better because you can get updates faster and automatically.

[–] orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should be able to get automatic updates on librewolf as well (at least on Linux).

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having to apt-get update && apt-get upgrade regularly is no auto upgrades

[–] orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Oh I see what you mean, I thought you meant it wouldn't update at all during a normal apt upgrade.

[–] moreeni@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

LibreWolf is glorified arkenfox.js. You also have to put your trust into the LibreWolf team so they don't ship you a compromised binary and stuff. I'd prefer Arkenfox for security reasons.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly they're both good, go with what you're comfortable with.

I use mullvad browser because it's Arkenfox plus tor plus ublock origin. It's just easier out of the box for me, especially because I hop between multiple computers.

[–] benpo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If you're asking, means that you're willing to go through arkenfox configuration, setting up your rules and parameters, etc... So I'd say go for it. You can always go back to LibreWolf.