170
submitted 1 month ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

Initial Recall preview was lambasted for obvious privacy and security failures.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 74 points 1 month ago

Like clockwork; wait till the outrage dies down, try again in a few months.

[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 1 month ago

every single time.

they always come back to try again.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Free Software is the only permanent defense to enshittification tactics.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago

It worked for Google

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I mean, I don't think they ever said "you're all right, we'll never do anything like this again and retire the entire idea".

They said they were reassessing the security concerns. Which they did, and are trying again with slightly different methodology.

I'm not telling you to like the feature idea, but you're acting as if Microsoft is trying to hoodwink people in this specific case, when they are actually just doing what they said they were going to do.

[-] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 month ago

I wonder why they're so insistent to add it if all the data stays on device?

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago

Surely they would never add even more telemetry that reports back nearly all of your important online activity to Microsoft.

Right?

[-] patrick@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Because it actually seems useful for a lot of people? I'd actually want to run this, but I don't use Windows.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago

At least they seem to have addressed some of the security implications:

The database will be encrypted at rest and will require authentication (and periodic reauthentication)

The feature will also be off by default

But of course, nothing on the front of whether or not Microsoft will collect data on you using it. We can trust them there, I'm sure.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

The feature will also be off by default

For now. so-far

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago

Because of course they are. It went so well the first time.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 16 points 1 month ago

Are they mentally or ethically incontinent? Stupid and/or evil is leaking out from everywhere.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

What they're doing is likely to work because it follows the pattern of outrage, waiting out the outrage, and doing the thing that caused outrage anyway.

It's what they want, and unless something remarkable happens, they're going to get it. They're competent at it, fucked up as it is.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

They're fixing the things that people claimed to be outraged about.

Guess we'll see whether that outrage was rational or just, well, outrage.

[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

All shall be sacrificed on the altar of shareholder value

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

that'll coincide with the date of uninstalling Windows off my last PC!

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
170 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

1205 readers
284 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS