I think we’re in an age when nuclear deterrent is actually less effective because the West is very unlikely to use anything like a nuclear bomb, whereas our adversaries might
Anyway, good luck on that three front war
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
79 points (95.4% liked)
news
23554 readers
39 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Let's take a look at a comprehensive list of countries that have used nukes against others:
🇺🇲
Based on this, we conclude that the US is less likely to use nukes against others. I'm very smart
Not only that but the US spent the entirety of the Cold War trying to either use nukes again or find some way to deploy nukes to every soldier and conflict possible, with everything from nuclear demolition charges to artillery shells
Given their way the US would arm every soldier with a nuclear rifle if they could
Given their way the US would arm every soldier with a nuclear rifle if they could
Many years ago at reddit - I saw that somebody had made a nuke "Davy Crockett" joke. For about 10 seconds I had this dialog with myself in my head "That can't be real. But could it? But it can't. Davy Crockett? How can that be real. I'm the world's dumbest man - I'll google." I still can't believe they named it Davy Crockett.
the US deployed backpack-sized nuclear weapons to Europe for decades as part of a stay-behind Gladio type operation, whose intent was to detonate nukes guerilla style in a Soviet-overrun Europe
The Littlest Boy | Foreign Policy
linking an archive because this article has suspiciously been removed from FP's website, just loads a blank page.
Let's also consider the stances of those countries on a nuclear first strike:
- China: Unambiguous "No First Use", with no exceptions
- Iran: Doesn't even have nukes and afaik has been cleared of ever trying to do so by international inspectors
- Russia: Reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if WMD are deployed against itself or its allies or if the very existence of the state is threatened with conventional warfare
- The US: Still has full first use.
For fun, the other countries with nukes:
- The UK: Has openly stated they will use nukes in a pre-emptive strike, officially has no stance on a "No First Use" policy in order to "keep its enemies guessing"
- Israel: Doesn't have nukes (winkwinknudgenudge) but would 300% use them if they did
- India: No first use against states without nukes
- Pakistan: Full first use.
- North Korea: First use if they get attacked
the projection is off the charts
You think the stock market crashes when they try shit with China?
My guess is it spikes as everyone pumps up MIC stocks and then craters when ships start sinking the next day
Extremely critical support to the engineers who made US warships touchscreen-controlled.
They have to scan a QR code to fire missiles
What if bad Tesla controls but on a huge expensive ship?
Man who earns living from defense spending spreads baseless fears of coming war
New talking point to get bigger defense contracts just dropped. And he has another one:
"I think we’re in an age when nuclear deterrent is actually less effective because the West is very unlikely to use anything like a nuclear bomb, whereas our adversaries might," he added. "Where you have technological parity but moral disparity, the actual disparity is much greater than people think."
Karp continued: "In fact, given that we have parity technologically but we don’t have parity morally, they have a huge advantage."
Imagine thinking the US has the moral high ground, and that having the moral high ground is a disadvantage.
given that we have parity technologically
oh like hypersonic missiles, right 
He claims the West is too moral to effectively fight these opponents, who would use unscrupulous means.
Hahaha what the fuck?
It’s just pure vibes. The Middle Eastern wars never happened. Or maybe actually it was China that did all that.
The US wouldn’t stand a chance against all three at once. Delusional moron.
I recently read a super weird essay written in ~~2017~~ 2007 by the other Palantir founder, Peter Thiel, called 'The Straussian Moment' - and it's wild how they're still talking about some of the exact same things.
For anyone wanting insight into the particular brand of fascism coming out of silicon valley these days, it's worth a read.
Losing two wars simultaneously in Iraq and Afghanistan wasn't good enough, we need to lose three instead
That one scene from Office Space where he asks his neighbor what his dream is but he says, "Shit man, losing three wars at the same time"
Eh, they accomplished their objectives (enriching the MIC and oil companies). I don't really consider that a loss.
Short term success vs long term losses. Yeah they made some profits during the war, but they would have preferred these countries to be allied so they can siphon more off over time
the U.S. is unable to dictate terms to Yemen but this dullard thinks it can fight two nuclear-armed states (both of which have demonstrably better production capacity) and a major regional power all at the same time
So this is why you need my perpetual global spyware!
Select CEO mode
- Beg Mode - your CEO will lobby and harangue Government for free money the public purse.
- Sell Mode - your CEO will make wild “I am the main character “ predictions about the future, on randomly selected topics, no qualifications are required
- Power off
Three front wars famously go well for empires.
"The president needs to tell them if you cross these lines, this is what we’re going to do, and you have to then enforce it."
has entered the chat
Palantir is CIA funded. I believe wholeheartedly that they will a try to start up a new cold war..
Start? We're 5+ years in, mate
It came from In-q-tel so it's basically 100% CIA
Companies that are controlled by the CIA can't help but say dumb shit. Look at notepad++ and Proton as two examples.
What have I missed about both of them?
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
"You can trust me, I spy on everything" -Spyguy McSubterfuge working for Clandestine Inc.
that seems to be the plan... the empire is gonna fall hard and fast
Death to America