204
submitted 1 year ago by tst123@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

Anything short of completely descheduling it is an injustice.

[-] esadatari@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

under schedule 3 it’ll be easier to obtain than adderal.

i know the young folks think it should be an all or nothing solution but the truth is the country as a whole rarely moves that way with so many contending views.

this is how you change those views against it, by removing the demonization over time in phases.

this gives time for the private prison systems and big pharma and big alcohol/tobacco to get their ducks in a row for the changes that will surely arrive.

when the people who believe that it is the worst drug ever see what a difference in perception can do as the government no longer demonizes it, that’s when it’ll be fully legalized.

shit sucks but with over half the country filled with fucking idiots, you really need to be able to crawl before you can walk or even run. this is a step in the right direction and i’ve been around long enough to see what a fucking foot in the legal door this is.

[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Weed is legal recreationally in 50% of the country already. Just legalize it federally.

[-] esadatari@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

cool. let’s just get a list of all the republican congressman and senators that will surely vote yes on this.

it’s not a dictatorship, thank god, and half the country’s leadership is against it and won’t vote for its legalization at this point in time.

so go ahead. get that list of republicans. because they also have a lot of the deciding power. the president is one man on one side of the isle.

this is a way of changing that slowly and surely.

so while yea they should legalize it federally, with the current fuckwads on the right fucking things up for everyone, full legalization isn’t in the books yet. if you don’t see that, then there’s no getting through to you and have a nice day.

[-] LordXenu@artemis.camp 2 points 1 year ago

What I am excited about is by easing scheduling scientific research could be done at a much faster rate. Having actual data and research would help guide the legal transition. Laws and social expectations will have to be worked out once it’s readily available.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/drug-scheduling

The DEA Drug Scheduling list is a complete fucking mess. However, by definition alone I would place Marijuana in Schedule 3 or 4.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

If you didn't know, it wasn't that long ago (2014) that hydrocodone was a schedule 3. Imagine that shit.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It can stay scheduled. But it should be schedule 4 - low potential for abuse, low risk of dependence.

[-] Sanguine@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

But that is objectively false... it's at least a moderate risk for both abuse and dependence.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It is not physically addictive. If your life sucks and you use it to cope, you'll be cranky when you stop, same as if you used trash TV to cope but your cable goes out.

You cannot overdose on pot. You can try, and the worst that will happen is that you'll fall asleep. It is not dangerous on its own.

Don't like the schedule 4 distinction? Fine, pick another. But having it set to schedule 1, same as heroin and PCP, is insane and 100% politically motivated.

[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Weed is actually physically addictive just much less so than other drugs. Heavy users can't sleep or eat, and have bad neausea and GI issues for weeks after quiting. That's literally all physical withdrawal. If you're someone who says oh I smoke and can quit whenever and don't have those problems then I can tell you, you aren't smoking nearly as much weed as some other people lol.

I'm not against weed, I use it all the time, but it is absolutely physically addictive. More so than caffeine.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

My dopamine levels get pretty fuckin wonky when I do a month long break after 6+ months.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is not physically addictive. If your life sucks and you use it to cope, you’ll be cranky when you stop, same as if you used trash TV to cope but your cable goes out.

I see you have meet an ex of mine. Totally useless and unable to do anything after work except watch 3 hours of the same TV shows she grew up with. No, we didn't break up over this. It was mildly annoying not relationship breaking.

[-] Sanguine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It is physically addictive.

Schedule 1 is bullshit but schedule 4 is too lax.. schedule 3 would be the best fit.. also on the topic, benzos should absolutely be ranked higher than 4.

[-] JDubbleu@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Considering you cannot die from overdose or withdrawal I very much disagree.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That can't be true. There must be some level high enough that can kill you.

[-] Thassodar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It is more than can possibly be consumed by any person in a single lifetime, and there's no concentration of that amount in existence.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ok you are saying it unreasonable via normal methods. Not that if you were trying and had a full-scale lab.

[-] escapesamsara 2 points 1 year ago

No it'd be unreasonable if you were trying in a full-scale lab with sci-fi grade vats of pure THC. The LD50 is 1270mg per 1kg; or 101,600mg for an average American adult. For example that's about twice as toxic as table salt or about 10 times less toxic than caffeine. If you were to fall in a vat of pure d9 THC suspended in any solution, you would drown before you could be exposed to enough to meet the LD50. If you got out of the vat without drowning, you would not die from the THC, literally it would be impossible. Additionally, at the rate it is metabolized by the body, that 101,600mg needs to happen within about a half hour. If you spread that exposure out over a day, you literally cannot die from it. To really emphasize this, if you're a functional adult eating 2,000 calories of the highest density gummy available on the market (25mg d9 thc x 10 cal) per day, getting all of your nutrition from THC gummies, you would be ingesting around 5,000mg of d9 THC that day; remember you need 101,600mg per hour to reach the LD50.

It is literally not physically possible to ingest enough to overdose, and injecting it does nothing. It is easier to accidentally overdose on water than it is d9 THC.

[-] Sanguine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

There are absolutely withdrawal symptoms for cannabis use. Lethality is not the criteria used to determine abuse or dependence potential.

[-] Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He didn’t say no withdrawal symptoms, but in any event, that’s not relevant. Caffeine and nicotine both have withdrawal symptoms comparable in severity. Now if you want to discuss withdrawal from benzodiazepines or alcohol there is a lot of work there. Why aren’t they scheduled as aggressively? Because if the medical applications and from appetite stimulation in oncology patients to ptsd, marijuana has justifiable benefits.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Is THC the main ingredient in Soma?

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
204 points (96.8% liked)

News

22962 readers
5458 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS