this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Australia

3668 readers
309 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
0
Fact-checking for the "No" referendum pamphlet was not compulsory (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Undefined@lemm.ee to c/australia@aussie.zone
1 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Includes some useful answers to concerns people may have about voting yes.

all 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Affidavit@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is abundantly clear that the alleged 'journalist' responsible for fact-checking this had an ulterior motive.

  1. The High Court does interpret constitutional legislation
  2. The ambiguity does include a risk of delays and dysfunction due to poor wording in the proposed legislation
  3. Australians wanting to know what they are actually voting for is not 'misinformation'.

...

I stopped wasting my time here. It is clear that whomever did this assessment was being disingenuous. Won't waste my time reading further.