this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7183 readers
1198 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] witheyeandclaw@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The highest credit bureaus in the US have beaten them to the punch!

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

That Mr. Burns "invincible" gag, except instead of diseases it's identity thieves crowding each other out.

[–] delirious_owl 2 points 2 months ago

I think it was only one of them

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I feel like we need more secure than a handful of numbers account for our entire life.

[–] valaramech@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Social Security Numbers were never intended to be used the way they are. They were expressly for identifying you to the Feds for the purpose of SSI. Business just looked at that and said "hey, that's a good way to identify people" and ignored the feds when they asked politely for them to fucking not.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Yup, I get the history and Gov'ment went along withit.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I mean, this is where a biometric identity authentication system would be beneficial, but like fucking hell if I trust any current entity, government or private, to run it securely for anyone's benefit and not sell the data to 3rd parties or keep it secure.

[–] delirious_owl 1 points 2 months ago

eIDs are coming. Be careful what you wish for.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

Again?

Numbers didn't change, no reason to reinvent the wheel.

[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

aw hell yeah! I didn't need that anyway.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago
[–] DornerFangirl@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

111-11-1111. 111-11-1112 too ez