this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

World News

12 readers
3 users here now

News from around the world!

founded 1 year ago
 

In Honduras, communities are fighting back against privatization and foreign exploitation after Honduran President Xiomara Castro and Congress repealed a law that established so-called Economic Development and Employment Zones, where private companies have “functional and administrative autonomy” from the national government. Now a Delaware-based company called Próspera has launched a case to challenge the repeal of the law under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement and is seeking almost $11 billion, which amounts to nearly two-thirds of the country’s entire 2022 budget. This is an example of the “extreme investor rights” of this international trade agreement directly opposing Honduran sovereignty, says Melinda St. Louis, director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch. We also speak with local leader Venessa Cárdenas of Crawfish Rock, the area directly impacted by the Próspera ZEDE on the island of Roatán, about the stress of losing control over their community. “We don’t know when our home will be taken from us,” says Cárdenas. “We, of course, have the rights to be free and previously consulted on any type of project that is being done in our community.”

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] livus@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Economic Development and Employment Zones, where private companies have “functional and administrative autonomy” from the national government.

That's literally corporate feudalism. It's terrifying that Honduras has been challenged for repealing this law.

[–] rafoix@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine a country not having the ability to pass and repeal laws.

[–] proprioception@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yes it's horrifying. The article states that most Western countries are moving away from trade deals that allow corporations to sue countries for loss of business etc, but I believe that pacts like the Trans Pacific Partnership may include such idiotic rights for corporations; leaving countries in compromised situations should they need to change business practices for example.