406
Trump Falsely Claims Biden Was ‘Convicted’ in Documents Case
(www.mediaite.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
406 points (98.3% liked)
politics
18931 readers
4465 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I continue to find it odd that in this day and age, with all the information at our fingertips, someone can lie on one TV channel and someone will believe it without even so much as a quick Google to fact check.
In response to the tsunami of propaganda and falsehoods on the Internet, some people decide they simply won’t care about facts anymore because it’s easier.
This is how Russia is today. No one knows what the truth is, so they accept whatever they want and ignore the rest.
Russia benefits from the western approach that when two sides are argue they do it in a good faith, so the truth is in the middle.
This is why the firehose of falsehoods works so well. The victims know that a lot of it are lies, but they also believe that some of it has to be truth.
I feel like that's a lot of people on a lot of things in life.
Google is own my democrats. Only trust orange man.
Not only that, but the fact Twitter has a better mechanism for this with community notes than most media.
How the F- do these media companies air a snippet of him lying without immediately following it up with the facts. The fact that his lies are not even news anymore just saddens me to no end. And it emboldens other psychopaths around the world.
Because then the Donald would stop giving interviews and then they will lose revenue
Tbf Google's AI will hallucinate and out and out lie to you depending on what question you ask it, so maybe it isn't the best source. I agree it amazes me that people can lie like this and not be checked for questioned... And Google use to be the best way to check. Unfortunately it isn't any more. And various news sites have their own agenda and won't always tell you the truth either. Unfortunately I dont know of any source you can quickly check and get a definitive and unequivocal answer any more and I think people like trump understand and exploit this.
It's true that Google is now a pile of shit for targeted searching of a topic, but if you just searched for any claim like "biden convicted documents" I'm sure you would at least not get a list of articles confirming the lie.
EDIT: I just searched the above and it's just a long list of "biden won't face charges", "no charges for biden" and even some "trump falsely claims biden was convicted" already
Yeah, but in the qon cinematic universe, "Big Tech" is in the pocket of liberals (lol). So they cannot trust Google's search results, at least if it counters their worldview.
many argue that there's no "objective" journalism and that the solution is to report it as is or always serve opinion pieces.
imo these proposed solutions suck and we end with more useless data.