this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
677 points (92.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9629 readers
554 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You expect people to walk to a train station? Have you seen how far apart everything is in rural areas?

Hi, yes please, Id like to walk two hours to get on a train, and I like to walk two hours to get back home when do. And thats assuming you live fairly close to town, within 5 or 6 miles or so.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People have been walking through rural areas for 12,000 years. Because that's how long ago agriculture was invented.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except you know, horses.

Also, we have cars now.

And its not 12,000 years ago.

There is zero point in getting in walking two hours to a train station when you can just drive there.

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of those options emits carbon and drives humanity closer to extinction and one doesn't. Do you prefer the time saving convenient genocide, or walking?

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mate, so long as we ship plastic across the pacific, cruises still exist, and execs fly private planes, thats a non-starter.

Further more, those buses would run empty most of the time, causing more emissions than if people just drove. Have you even been to rural America?

[–] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why we should have electric trains going to every rural community

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Electric trains still have emissions. Not just power, but maintence as well. Overhead lines go down, pantographs leave metal dust everywhere, hell even just normal rail maintence.

Theres a reason why all the American passenger lines went bankrupt, and why Amtrak is funded by the government and still struggling.

And the best part is you'd spend a trillion dollars running lines everywhere, and almost no one would ride it.

Edit: its costs 75,000 dollars per year per mile to maintain electric track. Its completely unfeasible. http://rockymountainrail.org/documents/RMRABP_CH7_OperatingCosts_03.2010.pdf

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did your dumb ass really just pull numbers from the Rocky Mountain Rail Authority, a rail planning committee trying to figure out how to make a train from Denver to Vail and say their numbers are equal to what the rest of the country would experience?

That’s the dumbest thing I’ve read and I’ve read several other comments of yours that are close to it.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Its the first one i found that gave actual numbers.