this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
1320 points (97.3% liked)

People Twitter

5228 readers
913 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's like literally everything he's done is to deliberately tank the company and lose billions of dollars.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Almost like it's on purpose...

[–] MarshReaper@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe after a few too wrong moves, he's trying to tank the company and make people think he's doing it on purpose so he could say that all this time he's been doing it on purpose. On purpose on purpose.

[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

or he's actually just sabotaging one of the largest western social networks through weaponizing his gross incompetence

[–] MarshReaper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe that all of these major players are being controlled at almost gunpoint into destroying their platforms and making horrible business decisions (facebook, twitter, youtube, etc).

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

They overextended in an era of easy money. Belts tighten and they still want to hit their growth targets, so they take away some sesame seeds.

I think people are realizing they don't really like the burger as much as they used to.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

"I'm so great, I can bankrupt a multibillion dollar company and lose tens of billions of dollars of my own money!"

Weird flex, but ok

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't attribute to malice what can easily be attributed to ignorance

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

True, but I don't think one prohibits the other.

I'd also add that a defense of ignorance becomes harder to attribute his moves to when he is surrounded by people who inform him. Choosing not to listen to them seems malicious.