this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
614 points (91.9% liked)

Atheist Memes

5578 readers
7 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It was probably intended as an origin myth just for Semitic peoples as to why they're holier than the pagan rabble around them and it just lost its way a bit and ended up confused

Then the NT comes and doubles down on the whole human race explicitly coming from Adam. Now that I think about it, I can't think of an OT reference explicitly saying everyone's from Adam? Maybe the ancient Jews just always knew genesis wasn't supposed to explain everything?

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just realized the Bible is kinda like ChatGPT drivel

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People say there are two genesis creation myths "mashed" together. I think this is true, but not really giving enough credit to the people doing the mashing who I think - as the rest of the literature pans out - not generally in the habit of writing directly contradictory things (usually you have to dig deeper for mistakes, but blatant surface level ones are not so common). They didn't have science, but they knew how stories worked. I think it's possible the original editor, when joining the myths together, intended the "man" created in myth 1 (the sixth day) to be understood as humanity in general. And myth two following on immediately is the specific creation of Adam on the eighth day. That would at least explain why Cain's wife is referred to so casually (as well as the implied peoples Cain is afraid of)

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

That's what I mean, ChatGPT recombines existing stuff without knowing and caring about a larger context. It seems the same thing happened with the Bible, I guess other "holy books" as well. It's not really a dig at the Bible, more like an interesting parallel between the mechanisms.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One interpretation is that 6th day creation is non adam people, and adam was created on the 8th day

Yes! Surprised I've not seen that brought up more often. Even if it was an editor working with two origin myths and joining them together, reading it that way at least gives them some credit...