this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
875 points (92.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9642 readers
338 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find public transportation is also subsidized. Any attempt to increase fares to cover costs gets a huge amount of push-back. People already pay for parking except on private lots. There are a lot of lower income people who have to use a car to work and live who'd be hit hard by price increases.

[–] lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I find public transportation is also subsidized.

The subsidies for cars is quite high, and it ought to be low because it is a destructive form of transportation. The subsidies for transit is quite low and should be high because it is the superior solution to the problem of moving people around.

Any attempt to increase fares to cover costs gets a huge amount of push-back.

Car roads having fares to cover costs isn't even a part of the discussion in the US. User fees (mostly gas tax) account for ~1/3 of the cost of roads, and this percentage is declining ^source^. That means people who make the ethical choice of not using a car are paying for those who make the unethical choice of using a car.

In general. I think it is good for the tax code to encourage prosocial behavior. Right now it does the opposite.

People already pay for parking except on private lots

This does not match with my experience. Where I live, and almost everywhere I have been, curb parking is usually free. And when its not free, it is highly discounted from the price of the land if you were to use the land for any other purpose.

Also, there are a lot of private lots. This is usually due to the strict parking mandates, where the government forces developers to build parking lots. This leads to a parking abundance where drivers refuse to pay reasonable fees for parking.

I recommend Henry Grabar's recent book, Paved Paradise on the topic of parking.