235

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17672200

jacobin.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago

Former congressman Harold Ford, former chair of the Democratic Leadership Council and banking executive, made a similar point on Fox. “I was an elite that supported you in 2020,” Ford said. “And said that we should do everything we possibly could do to advantage you against Bernie Sanders, because I thought Bernie Sanders’ politics were detrimental to the party and to the country.”

From Harold Ford's Wiki

In April 2021, Ford joined Fox News as a political contributor.[7] He frequently appears on Special Report as a panel member and was named a co-host of The Five in January 2022.

Hey great going democratic party leadership, you've always looked like incompetent morons, now you look like corrupt incompetent morons!

SHOULD HAVE BEEN BERNIE. YOU STOLE OUR FUTURE TO PRESERVE YOUR PRESENT PROFITS.

[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

SHOULD HAVE BEEN BERNIE. YOU STOLE OUR FUTURE TO PRESERVE YOUR PRESENT PROFITS.

I'm not sure we should be so pessimistic yet. They blocked a candidate but did nothing to kill it's popularity. As long as we don't succumb to Fascism within the next four years, there's still a massive base of voters that would vote for a socialist in the '28 primary, and the left democrats will have had 12 years since Bernie's first campaign to build up the infrastructure for it by that point.

[-] fern@lemmy.autism.place 3 points 2 months ago

They blocked a candidate but did nothing to kill it's popularity

Nothing? I can think of a few laws that are killing minorities rn, and let's not get stared on the police...

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Fox News pundit now openly admits wanting to YET AGAIN fool people into helping billionaires get gigantic GOP tax cuts like in 2016 which was Bernie's worst nightmare".

2016: PROFITS WERE INCREASED GREATLY

SHOULD HAVE BEEN BERNIE.

We should have had more people wanting to vote Bernie. Absolutely. Too bad you didn't work hard enough on that.

TO PRESERVE YOUR PRESENT PROFITS.

Biden raised the minimum corporate tax from 0% to 15%, and skillfully did it with the votes of 2 senators who are now independents.

2020: PROFITS WERE NOT PRESERVED.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Too bad you didn’t work hard enough on that.

Certainly not as hard as the party worked to shut out progressives for you.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

for you.

For me as a huge Bernie Sanders supporter since before he was even a senator? LMFAO.

the party worked to shut out progressives

Will you stop with the nonsense? Who the fuck is "the party" and exactly how the fuck do they "shut out" people like me? You NEVER hear Bernie Sanders saying this shit -- because he's not an idiot.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
235 points (83.9% liked)

politics

18973 readers
3697 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS