this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
95 points (95.2% liked)

Games

16737 readers
399 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] lath@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So it wasn't the bugs that went unfixed for about 20 of their "seasons", the cheaters that kept at it for years without being discovered and willingly showed their stuff after giving up the game for good, the report system being almost entirely placebo, nor their so-called events being the Mobile gacha "give us money to win this dumbass recolor in paint" type, but the battle pass being split in two that got "gamers" to pile on the negative reviews?

Pathetic. We really are a bunch of simpletons.

[โ€“] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago

Seems like it could be that they didn't fix any of that and then decided to charge at least twice for the same experience. If it's not expensive people will accept flaws, but if they have glaring flaws and decide to increase the cost that'll piss people off. Or I could be wrong, I don't know what every gamer that gives it a bad review is thinking unlike your illustrious self.