this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
889 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

5230 readers
479 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That isn't equal to the "width" of your dick though. Diameter is closer.

I guess it doesn't really matter if the measure is standard (though elasticity would also affect fit) so you "learn your size" once, but it doesn't seem super useful to me.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but diameter is also harder to measure on something like a latex tube. Just measure the circumference, divide by 2, then measure the condom.

I'd personally prefer it to be the circumference (so double the condom width).

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just divide that number by pi.

Then you can reasonably approximate with a ruler over the top with no math.

Why not divide by tau and then again by 2? Tau is superior anyway.