this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
1042 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
2188 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
1042
Just kind of makes sense no? (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by yokonzo@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Parking lots, warehouses, malls, walmarts (and similar superstores), even stretches of in-city highways. There's millions of acres of viable space for solar panels, just no financial incentive to install and maintain it.

[–] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why is the incentive to install them higher, in rural land and areas that could have been fields or forrest?

[–] Kampfkrapfen_Backup@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Cause it's cheaper I guess?

[–] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 1 points 4 months ago

If it is, it can't be with much. Maybe regulations and issues with reflections. I can't see it being much cheaper