I think you're kind of missing the point, having solar panels in parking lots would add use to otherwise useless land. There's plenty of them in the US and it would also create a relief from the concrete hotspots that it makes. I mean have you ever been walking through a parking lot and hating your life because you're sweating so much?

[–] EherNicht@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

I get that. That really makes sense. Tho it kind of makes it harder to then justify getting rid of parking to improve density. But this will most likely also not happen otherwise so yeah

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This idea has been around 20 years...

The problem has always been cost.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Costs that have dropped precipitously over the past 20 years

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not the cost of the panels, it's the cost of the structure to hold them. And the maintenance involved.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 4 months ago

There are solar generating facilities literally everywhere now. To mount them high enough to park under is a miniscule cost difference. There are also already massive parking lots with covers all over the place. We have probably 5,000+ covered parking spaces at the airport in my city, for example