this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
95 points (98.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
12 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Holding electeds even marginally accountable is bad acktuallllyyy ... This is just so exhausting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

its potential is quite untapped to many hexbears here, like right now the marxist group is kicking out the social democrat leadership

[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Didn’t the post you’re replying to make the point that if that group obtained leadership and exercised power, it would split?

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

if that group obtained leadership and exercised power, it would split?

I meant more, if it clarified its direction and goal, it would split because it's big enough and does enough different things (or is a vehicle for people to do different things) that people join it for all types of reasons whether that be tenant organizing or electing progressive democrats, so people would probably leave if the org stopped facilitating one or the other

Still true that it has a lot of potential

[–] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

it really doesn't have the centralization to do anything about that anyway. Its either the marxists taking over or the collaborators

[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You probably know more than I do, and I’d always prefer the Marxists lmao

[–] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

nah dsa infighting is fuckin weird

like stalinists and trots are just two of the several factions that somehow don't explode next to each other

[–] grandepequeno@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm aware, it's something to look forward to but it's bound to result in a lot of soft leftists leaving because it won't be a democrat electing machine

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

The DSA has set back progress for a generation acting like an arm of the DNC. It took the Bernie energy and squandered it, leaving actual leftist parties to starve and rot. fedposting working as intended.