this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
328 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former Trump official joins a group of Republicans who have referred to the vice president as a diversity hire

Newsmax personality and former Trump aide Sebastian Gorka described Vice President Kamala Harris a “DEI hire” and “colored” in an interview on Tuesday.

In the segment, Gorka, himself accused of inflating his credentials as a terrorism expert, predicted that Biden will be forced to withdraw from the presidential race if major Democratic donors “pull the plug.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I mean, it's a pretty key difference that she was only elected in that she was attached to the ticket that people were actually voting for.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

she was only elected in that she was attached to the ticket that people were actually voting for.

¿¡ they came as a pair. if either one were so completely distasteful, neither one would have elected. the "ticket" included everyone on it.

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who is the VP for that other guy? No one knows yet...

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, that just kinda proves the point further?

Anybody that's gonna vote for Trump is gonna vote for him regardless of who his VP is. The VP is only TeChNiCaLlY an elected office, because 99.99% of people are voting for the president and not the VP.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

At this point, we should be voting on who is chosen as VP. It's almost certain either one will be the 49th. (That is, if we don't go full monarchy and get some Drumpf spawn as 49th "president")

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

At this point, I think the best thing would be for Biden to run, get re-elected, and then die early in his term to make Kamala Harris the President. I'm not super thrilled about her but I think she's better than just about any other option we've got at the moment.

I just don't trust this fucking electorate to vote for a Black, Indian, Woman for president.