this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
846 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
3615 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
846
Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works (www.cnn.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
367 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works::Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kklusz@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude, they said

If AI is just blatantly copy and pasting what it read, then yes, I see that as a huge issue.

That’s in no way agreeing “that’s it’s a massive clusterfuck that these companies just purloined a fuckton of copyrighted material for profit without paying for it”. Do you not understand that AI is not just copy and pasting content?

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you not understand that AI is not just copy and pasting content?

show me where I claimed it was, *because I didn't"

don't put words in my mouth then pretend to get all outraged about something I didn't say, lmao

[–] kklusz@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Um, you implied it when you said the other guy was agreeing with you, when he was clearly not? How else could you possibly think he agrees? Piss poor reading comprehension perhaps?

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Piss poor reading comprehension perhaps?

you've identified the problem, but are in error regarding the person at issue.

good luck with that ;)

[–] kklusz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Confident incompetence. What a sight to behold!

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kklusz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hahaha that’s a good one, I’ll give you that!

If only you were capable of saying more than “Nuh-uh you”. Sigh.