this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
1092 points (95.5% liked)

Memes

45655 readers
1661 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I don't like to use relative numbers to illustrate the increase. 48% can be miniscule or enormous based on the emission last year.

While I don't think the increase is miniscule it's still an unessesary ambiguity.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The relative number here might be more useful as long as it's understood that Google already has significant emissions. It's also sufficient to convey that they're headed in the wrong direction relative to their goal of net zero. A number like 14.3 million tCO₂e isn't as clear IMO.

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can understand that, but I feel it's dumbed down. Better to state the increase and then say it's relative to [some relatable fact] perhaps?

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

This is the way