this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
126 points (97.7% liked)

Linux

48247 readers
713 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Where should I mount my internal drive partitions?

As far as I searched on the internet, I came to know that

/Media = mount point for removable media that system do it itself ( usb drive , CD )

/Mnt = temporarily mounting anything manually

I can most probably mount anything wherever I want, but if that's the case what's the point of /mnt? Just to be organised I suppose.

TLDR

If /mnt is for temporary and /media is for removable where should permanent non-removable devices/partitions be mounted. i.e. an internal HDD which is formatted as NTFS but needs to be automounted at startup?

Asking with the sole reason to know that, what's the practice of user who know Linux well, unlike me.

I know this is a silly question but I asked anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gpstarman@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

fixed disks under /mnt

NAS in /media

Why ? that's what I'm asking. Can't you just put in the same folder and call it a day?

I put my fixed disk in /mnt

My Files, which are inside the partition mounted in /mnt/something has root as Owner. So When I try to move something to Trash, it's not allowing me to do, Only perma delete. When saw properties it said owner is root.

Is it because mounted at /mnt?

Files under /media seems fine. files under /media says it's owner is 'me'

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The answer to your question why is because I arbitrarily decided on that years ago. That's basically all there is to it.

The answer to your file ownership problems I can't answer, because I don't have that happening. My files are mounted like so:

LABEL=BigHD /mnt/BigHD btrfs nosuid,nodev,nofail,noatime,x-gvfs-show,compress-force=zstd:1 0 0

[–] gpstarman@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago

The answer to your question why is because I arbitrarily decided on that years ago. That's basically all there is to it.

Thanks for clarifying bro

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mounting to a specific location should not affect the permissions of the drive. But in the case of NTFS and some other filesystems, Linux is not compatible with their permission model, so it is simplified by e.g. making all files be only accessible by root.
You can override this default with mount options, or change the permissions to sensible values with chmod and chown, but I'm not sure if changing them will have negative side effects on the windows side so the latter may not be a good idea.

[–] gpstarman@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thank you bro. I think I'll stick into making new folder for my disks in /.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I would recommend to put them inside /mnt for internal disks. It's a bit more organized that way, and by looking at the path is easier to know that it's in an internal drive.

[–] gpstarman@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago

Thank you for the recommendation.