Free and Open Source Software

17937 readers

84 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

122

SerenityOS and LadyBirds: Because These Things Shouldn't Hide in Closed Git Conversations - ░ Nova Online (cmdr-nova.online)

submitted 4 months ago by Luci@lemmy.ca to c/foss@beehaw.org

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Found this blog post and found it had more insight into the issues around the dev and the toxicity in FOSS

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

On top of that, ‘he’/etc has been effectively gender ambivalent for a long time

Appeal to tradition bias

I understand the desire to change that, but it’s still a normal thing in English language.

So is singular 'they'.

The rest of your post is just a slippery slope argument.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Your entire comment is argument from fallacy. Lol

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

I thought they gave a pretty good rebuttal in regards to the singular 'they'. Just because they mentioned a fallacy in the begging doesn't mean it's an argument from fallacy.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Appeal to tradition bias?

Yes. Turns out languages work by saying things the same way somebody else said them before.

My point isn't that there can't be a reason to change. My point is calling 'he' out as implying misogyny on the part of the author is ridiculous, and fussing over changing it is, in this situation, in my opinion, petty.

So is singular 'they'.

Indeed. Some English contexts are used to defaulting to 'he' for ungendered animate; some to 'they'. Neither necessitates an egregious humanitarian wrong.

The rest of your post is just a slippery slope argument.

I did get facetious toward the end. If you like, you don't have to build your life philosophy on the foundation of the logical integrity of my closing paragraph. Up to you.