this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1432 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
2961 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmington_steele@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

and the most interesting part of the whole situation is that the other side most likely thinks the same

[–] OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except there's no need to hypothesize about what the "the other side" wants. They have been perfectly vocal about what they think are issues that need to be "solved":

  • Accurate history lessons
  • Transgender people
  • Women's ability to have deadly ectopic pregnancies removed
  • "Urban" people
  • The right to protest against the flag
  • Gay people

If you have enough knowledge of history to know what a "final solution" looks like, you are justified in seeing "the other side" as the main problem.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not really. Right wingers seem to like centrists.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

But since these are mutually exclusive propositions, only one side can actually be correct. Do you really think it's more likely to be the science-denying conspiracy-minded side? The side that elected a transparent con man and buffoon, and appears to want to elect him again?