this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
268 points (98.9% liked)

News

23311 readers
4139 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In case you don’t get it, just go to google images and type in “John Holmes”

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What does Mark Wahlberg's penis have to do with anything?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Presumably not much, unless you're Rhea Durham 🤷

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Yes, but asking "What does Mark Wahlberg's fake penis have to do with anything" would let readers know that I'm in on the joke, thus ruining the comedy.

You see, in this example, I'm playing the archetype of the buffoon in which I'm feigning dual confusion: first that John Holmes was a fictional character portrayed by Mark Wahlberg, and second that I believed Mark Wahlberg's penis in the movie Boogie Nights was real.

Had I used a descriptor noting that Mark Wahlberg's penis was a prosthetic, I'd be showing more intimate knowledge of the film Boogie Nights, from which one could more easily assume that I also know that John Holmes and Mark Wahlberg are, in fact, two different people.

Perhaps I could have said something like "prosthetic pp" which would have the comedic values of alliteration and immaturity. Certainly, that could have evoked a positive response from viewers, but the role of the buffoon is often not completed until compared to a more anchored character. "Prosthetic pp" would have made my delivery both the comment and the punchline, but by portraying the role of the buffoon and simply referencing "Mark Wahlberg's penis," I left the dialog open for someone else to provide comedic input by responding. This means that I not only get to share the limelight with another user, but that readers get to enjoy even more humor by reading the next comment.

For example, @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world chose to put a button on the joke by referencing Mark Wahlberg's wife, Rhea Durham. This humorous comment could be seen as the final note in our humorous exchange, which began with a humorous retort by @Velonie@lemmy.world to @TheFlopster@lemmy.world correction of @shalafi@lemmy.world common misuse of the word "hung" instead of "hanged." Although, Viking's response also left things somewhat open-ended by saying "presumably" and using a shrug emoji; this opening means someone could continue the humor, such as using a classic improv response format of "yes and." Perhaps another user would like to reply to Viking with something like "presumably nothing, gimme that fat dick!"

Referring back to the archetypes of comedy, you can see how your response would most likely fall under that of the anchor, the neurotic, or the cynic. In this scenario, you're probably playing the role of the neurotic or the cynic as @FlyingSquid@lemmy.world anecdotally mentioned his father, making him either the anchor or the innocent.

You'll note that this current response to your comment is unlikely to be found on the archetypes of comedy list because I'm currently breaking the fourth wall and am just an asshole. If you've read this far, I'm sorry.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago

10/10 response to being asked to explain a joke. Somehow you made the joke explanation even funnier than the original joke.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps another user would like to reply to Viking with something like "presumably nothing, gimme that fat dick!"

If I had a dollar for every time people have said those exact words to me..I'd obviously still be broke.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Yes, but you'd be a few bucks richer and your obese friend, Richard, would have worsened insecurities!

Poor Fat Dick... 😔

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Except you didn’t write Mark Wahlberg’s fake penis, or Eddie Adams/Dirk Digler’s penis. You wrote Mark Wahlberg’s penis.

In contrast, John Holmes was a porn star who was famously well-endowed.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

FUCK! Good catch! I totally forgot that Mark Wahlberg's character was only inspired by John Holmes. You absolutely win.

I'd offer you a victory prize such as my last shred of dignity, but I think I lost that in my previous comment.

Damn, you're good, great job!

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I wasn’t trying to win. I’m sorry for sucking the fun out of the joke getting hung up on details. I didn’t know Dirk Digler was based on John Holmes, so thanks for teaching me something new!

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You didn't suck the fun out of anything. I don't always agree with you, but I always enjoy our discourse.

And if we've learned anything, the correct word is "hanged." Only John Holmes and @FlyingSquid@lemmy.world's dad are hung. And any prosthesis, obviously.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Agreed. I always seem to leave a conversation with you having learned something. It’s always appreciated.