Image is of Bolivian President Luis Arce (center, with glasses) face-to-face with General Zuñiga (in camouflage) during the coup attempt.
On the 26th of June, while Hexbear was in an 8-hour hibernation, General Juan José Zuñiga marched 200 troops and some armored vehicles on the government palace in an attempt to overthrow the democratically elected government of Luis Arce. This is somewhat reminiscent of Jeanine Anez's coup in November 2019 where she overthrew the socialist president Evo Morales, but while that coup was due to a colour revolution likely orchestrated by the United States and had at least a tiny amount of political/public legitimacy and "followed the rules" in a certain sense (as Morales was trying to abolish presidential term limits, which is only evil if a socialist is doing it), this was a much more naked attempted seizure of power by a military general.
This coup was quickly terminated without even a momentary transfer of power. Democracy was saved.
Despite being in the same party, Morales and Arce have increasingly been in opposition. Morales champions anti-imperialism, rights for indigneous people, and poverty reduction. This last one especially has been threatened by Arce, though it's not entirely his fault, as the Bolivian economy is threatened by the same crisis affecting so many developing economies around the world right now - say it with me now - a lack of dollars and mounting debt. The US Federal Reserve is carrying out a bloody offensive against the world's poor, and this has combined nastily with a rather uninspiring "post"-coronavirus economic recovery in Bolivia, as well as diminishing natural gas production (and thus less exports with which to earn dollars).
While the coup was ongoing, Morales banded behind the government. Afterwards, however, Morales expressed his skepticism about whether the coup was, in fact, genuine, calling for an independent investigation into it, and saying that Arce “disrespected the truth, deceived us, lied, not only to the Bolivian people but to the whole world." This is because General Zuñiga made a series of very interesting statements to his family and colleagues, saying that Arce had "betrayed" him, and saying that Arce had told him “‘The situation is very screwed up, very critical. It is necessary to prepare something to raise my popularity.'" This does check out on the surface level, at least: Arce has suffered increasing unpopularity as the economy has suffered.
Interestingly, Morales' narrative has been supported by the anarchocapitalist leader of Argentina, Javier Milei, who is currently busy completely destroying his own country and stripping the copper out of the walls to give to American capitalists. Milei said that the coup attempt was "fraudulent". Meanwhile, those inside MAS opposed to Morales' accusations of a false coup have accused him of allying with the fascist right and becoming an instrument of imperialism.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Bolivia! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Please check out the HexAtlas!
The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
nahh
some other shit
Huh I wouldn't think of comparing the feds to Stalin but I guess it takes a trot to have those kind of spitball takes
Much like a puppy surrounded by cats growing up won't necessarily want to play fetch-the-stick or tug-of-war with an old sock
An annoying guy having Trotsky as a godfather is something you'd see in some cult classic comedy like Network lmao.
bullshit
Here's a quote from the anti Stalinist left wikipage
This is trotsky saying ackshually i would have just rushed in to poland in 1932! and being celebrated
That whole article is a mess (duh)
Somebody once told me
What did Hudson do to anger hexbear? I remember a year ago he was the good economist.
yeah he is good... for an economist but a stupid historian. Just like how Finklestien is good as an historian about Gaza but if you start talking about LGBTQ rights he goes from the good one to the bad one really fast.
I'm thinking lately that rehabilitation of Stalin is also rehabilitiation of the USSR. My whole life the USSR has been presented as Stalin's hand puppet, even if he was dead at the time, and if he wasn't a uniquely evil cartoon villain then we can examine the actual ussr and it's actions critically instead of just screaming stalin bad from 1919 to 1991.
your comment reminded me of this paragraph from https://redsails.org/tankies/
Good post. I think "STALIN BAD" is very important to fascist ideologues as if Stalin isn't a perfect mind controlling puppet master demanding absolute loyalty then they have to explain why he was so popular with millions of party members and many millions more Soviet citizens. If it's all one evil man that's easy to explain away. But an entire prosperous, dedicated society of communists messes up their whole propaganda engine.
They pushed trotsky on us in highschool in . "Stalin evil bad and not communist, trotsky good communist but killed because human nature greedy, communism fail because human nature." I dunno if it was curriculum but it I got the same bad education from several teachers.
You have to have a dialectical understanding of human beings, someone that stood by your side one day can the next day be on the other side. You can appreciate what they did for you then but understand that they sorta suck later and vise versa. This also includes what commie Jones said in regards to intellectual specializations. Just because someone could be a foremost expert of a subject with genuine material analysis' it doesn't translate to them being 100% perfect on everything, people are people first and foremost. Not some sort of perfect ethereal beings we create in our minds only to go when they do something sorta shit later.
Hudson has interesting takes on global economics and debt. He's not particular good at being a commie.
there are quite a few genuine critiques of him. you do have to be careful to not attribute too much to him - analyses of how financialization interacts with capitalism predate him by decades (Lenin was talking about it in his day, for instance) so he's not the Modern Marx bringing shining new analyses of capitalism to the fore or anything. I think his near-total rejection of the USSR is a big point against him, and he has other reactionary tendencies (he has shown up on fascist websites IIRC - just doing his regular spiel that he does with leftist and liberal people too, as far as I know, but even so).
he also seems to espouse a very iffy view that industrial capitalism returning would be a big benefit in-and-of-itself (or a view that would be effectively equivalent to that, given his trot views), when we shouldn't lose sight that we oppose capitalism in general, it's just that we hate financial capitalism because of the landlords and rentierism that brings as well as industrial capitalism for the traditional reasons that big communist figures hated capitalism for. the theory is that a return to industrial capitalism in the West would mean that workers would be more able to seize the means of production because right now there's not really a lot of like, weapons factories and steel factories etc to seize and use in a revolution, but there's also the thirdworldist take that no matter what form of capitalism is happening in the West, it doesn't matter because there's an imperialist relationship and that relationship must end before revolution becomes viable in the West (and our job as westerners is to weaken our countries from within in preparation for eventual revolution). I guess I side more with the latter take than the former, especially because western reindustrialization seems essentially impossible anyway, so it's a useless hypothetical
so there's a lot to dislike about Hudson, I know that Roderic Day and others really doesn't like him, but I think it is possible to take what's good and ditch what's bad. he has takes I agree with on Russia and China, at least, which can be disappointingly difficult to find in the western left.