this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1398 readers
119 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to make a primal scream without gathering footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh facts of Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rook@awful.systems 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Eh, there’s a chance that machine learning might help here… there’s some interesting stuff come out of that area of research, like radio antennae and rocket engines and so on, but I’d bet anything that a) no LLMs were involved and none ever will be, and b) “ai” only appears in marketing copy and funding pitches.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

dunno about rockets, but antenna thingy works only because you can simulate performance of antenna very reliably, precisely and quickly. This data was fed back, random small changes were made, things that were an improvement passed to the next iteration. Not sure how this approach is called but none of it is LLM

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"genetic algorithm" - something I hadn't previously seen branded as "AI", but I guess I'm not surprised

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

yeah that's it, forgot a word for it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolved_antenna

that ST5 antenna looks like a low-poly two turn helical antenna, but how it looks like will be a function of design requirements

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

GAs went out of the limelight before the rest of the beaus of current “AI” branding came to be, suspect that might be part of it

(Another suspicion is that it’s because they’re…fairly observable, ito operation? So it’s far less easily claimable that one of these has gained sentience, or all the other dumb bullshit that the cluster has spun in recent years)