this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
1030 points (91.6% liked)

Political Memes

5445 readers
4486 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 93 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (17 children)

Between “Democrats say ‘Vote’” and “Democrats do nothing to fight back,” they didn’t vote in 2016.

This Supreme Court is a result of that inaction.

Congratulations on demonstrating how voter abstention hands the government to Republicans.

Let’s not do that any more.

[–] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 41 points 4 months ago (4 children)

We had 8 good years before that and didn't set up any protections.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 43 points 4 months ago (6 children)

During the last year of that, Obama was denied the ability to nominate a Supreme Court Justice on an Election Year. Then, Trump got 2 nominees appointed to the SCOTUS, one of which was on an election year.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You had the first 2 years of Obama. Obama's thanks for the ACA was voters not showing up and losing the house of representatives for year 3 and 4. And again for year 5 and 6. And then both the house and Senate in years 7 and 8. So no you didn't have 8 years with Obama, you had 2 years with Obama because voters did not show up. Congress is what passes laws and has power. They even shut down the freaking government under Obama.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

With a heavily divided legislature that only just passed the ACA before it exploded.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Only Congress can increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. We had two years of congressional majority in the last twenty. They focused on healthcare.

How could they have possibly predicted that they’d need to expand and pack the Supreme Court to prevent the next President from becoming a dictator?

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They focused on healthcare.

And they gave us Romneycare

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

And even that was a monumental task. One vote away in the Senate, and that one guy got rid of the single payer option for the cost of his vote. Joe Lieberman if you want to look him up, the guy who started no labels political party (without a platform).

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

4 years, or 3 because of Scott Brown. But we just had 2 years. And Obama had 1 year.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

More people (as a percentage of the eligible voting population) voted in 2016 than 2012, and more in 2020 than in 2016.

Finger wagging at people for criticizing the current ruling party (which is sending weapons to a country that is using them to commit genocide) instead of recognizing that we live in an undemocratic system is taking it out on the wrong people. Clinton literally won more votes in the election you're saying people didn't vote hard enough in. It's spitting in the face of everyone whose votes were shat on by the Electoral College to turn around and blame the people who were disenfranchised.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago (5 children)

No one is finger wagging for criticizing. They’re being chastised because they whining to everyone how they’re refusing to vote.

Criticize the fuck out of him. I don’t see anyone giving a shit about that-

FUCKING VOTE ANYWAY.

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who's saying they're refusing to vote?

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

That’s the topic of conversation here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I get your point, but only 48% of registered Democrats voted in 2016. 25% were abstention due to dislike of the candidate.

Unfortunately, more Democrats need to vote than Republicans, because of the disproportionate weight of Republican states’ electoral votes.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/06/01/dislike-of-candidates-or-campaign-issues-was-most-common-reason-for-not-voting-in-2016/

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters/

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m not seeing where in those links it says only 48% of registered Democrats voted? If I’m missing it please point it out. The overall turnout was about 60% of eligible voters, so Democrats pulling in less than that and STILL getting more votes would be shocking.

Getting angry at voters for not voting hard enough after turnout increases every election cycle should illustrate that yelling at people to vote harder isn’t a solution, it’s a stopgap. It doesn’t change that it’s an intentionally undemocratic system, and it doesn’t prevent the exact same “the person with less votes wins” result from happening again.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not sure who's downvoting you for asking for clarification. I think the person you responded to misinterpreted the first figure in their second link. It says among validated voters, 48% voted for Clinton and 45% for Trump.

Nowhere in those links does it say the percentage of voters by party registration that voted, and I can't find it in any other searching either. Your 60% turnout of voting-eligible population comes up all over the place though.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago

I don’t see the downvotes since I’m on Blahaj, that’s funny though. Sorry for reading the sources I guess? The 60% figure was straight from one of the linked articles!

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

25% were abstention due to dislike of the candidate.

Sounds like the problem is with who the DMC puts up, then. If 25% of your own team refuse to participate you've got s fucking problem

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Run better candidates to get more votes, it really is that simple. Blaming the voters just makes you look like a tool.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

And thinking that Democrats are primarily progressive makes you look like one.

A better candidate for progressives would have been Bernie. DNC fuckery aside, he was very polarizing to half of the party.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mitch McConnell specifically refused to allow Obama to appoint a justice while there was an election going on.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

That’s true. Had Obama appointed a Justice we’d just have 5-4 rulings instead of the 6-3 we have now. Trump’s immunity would still have passed.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not just voter abstention, but ineffective voting too. Voting 3rd in this election is a surefire way to get trump back in office. If you wanted to stick it to Biden and get someone else, your chance was 4 years ago during the primary.

You're not voting Biden because you like him, you're voting Biden because you want to be able to vote for someone else in 2028. That is literally what is at stake here, and it can't be said loud enough or often enough.

Before the "real left" quisling trolls respond, please tell us two things... Who is the 3rd party candidate you are supporting instead? What are their chances of winning this election?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (19 children)

your chance was 4 years ago during the primary.

I'm sorry I didn't realize we elected presidents for 8 year terms?

Edit- just preserving this quote.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Well said, but sadly they are a lot of people here that don’t care. Which is ironic, considering the meme.

load more comments (11 replies)