this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
655 points (69.5% liked)

Memes

45666 readers
1504 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (15 children)

Just because it's safe doesn't mean it's the best we have right now.

  • It's massively expensive to set up
  • It's massively expensive to decommission at end of life
  • Almost half of the fuel you need to run them comes from a country dangerously close to Russia. (This one is slightly less of a thing now that Russia has bogged itself down in Ukraine)
  • It takes a long time to set up.
  • It has an image problem.

A combination of solar, wind, wave, tidal, more traditional hydro and geothermal (most of the cost with this is digging the holes. We've got a lot of deep old mines that can be repurposed) can easily be built to over capacity and or alongside adequate storage is the best solution in the here and now.

[–] uis@lemm.ee -4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You realise you don't need to decomission entire building at EOL?

[–] bmarinov@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What about the storage for the used fuel? This is a massive problem for any country not occupying half a continent.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

As first step separate useful isotopes from used fuel. Most of used fuel are them. The rest won't be as big.

load more comments (12 replies)