this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
463 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2820 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Non-voting "leftists" will just find a way to moralize their shitty choice, just like they virtue signal about genocide and immediately promote tactics that are going to increase it.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bingo. I’m not saying there aren’t some legitimate leftists, but considering that they’re not doing shit about those posing as them to spread propaganda- really doesn’t help their agenda at all.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Many of them go to the streets, protest on their campuses or in their workplaces. Many of them got physically attacked by police or police endorsed fascist groups on campuses.

What did you do in the past 9 months? How many protests were you part of?

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The fuck has this to do with anything? Do you approach everyone that says things you disagree with using this bullshit?

This has nothing to do with protests. What I’m taking about are the leftists that do nothing about “the leftists” that pose as them to bandwagon the agenda for the purpose to get people to not vote against Trump.

And trust me- I do PLENTY during the years between elections. And what I do is far more effecting than protesting every four years over FOTW manufactured outrage.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So what do you do? Because you claim that everyone who will not vote for Biden and is announcing that would be doing nothing. Which is not only a very crass assumption to make, also with how you relate it to Palestine and claiming people would be part of a manufactured outrage you are either showing that genocide is not an important issue to you or even worse you deny others people outrage over genocide to be sincere. Especially with how understandably people most outraged and worried are of racialized communities this adds racists overtones to your statement. Now maybe that was not your intention in which case it is a good chance for you to reflect on it.

So what are you specifically doing aside from voting and insulting people on the internet?

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

ROFL! Dude. What I do and how much of it for how long- isn’t what this is about. And I’m fully aware of this tactic you’re using to turn the discussion around to put me on the defensive.

I’m not new to this.

News flash:

Not voting doesn’t cancel an election. Someone is still getting elected. And suggesting people not vote against Trump, is support for Trump. This is not up for debate. This is reality. With us or against us is a very real thing.

And the fact that most of the clowns that are not voting know damn well that things will be as bad is not FAR worse for Palestine if Trump is elected- and don’t care…. Says EVERYTHING we need to know about your agenda.

It’s been argued time-and-again how you people can’t offer a better candidate to win in November- but still fold your arms know how badly we will ALL be fucked if Trump gets the White House.

Even people for other countries have been pleading with you to do the right thing.

How fucking stupid can things get?

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Again you are attacking people proclaiming they would be doing nothing, when you know absolutely nothing about them, simply because they voice a different opinion to yours. But given how you avoided the question you create the impression that you in fact are doing nothing except from insulting people online.

Also your blissfull ignorance to the racial component of your allegations make me believe that you are a white upper class american who wants minorities to play by your ball as a Trump win would mildly inconvenience you. Meanwhile people who actually face threats from a Trump presidency also speak out against Biden because they understand that the US political system is there to genocide all non white people.

But the white liberal being a racist in disguise is something we now since the civil right movements.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

ROFL! Playing the racial card? Really? I might’ve entertained your shit take on this but trying to make me out to be a racist?

That’s fucking pathetic.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

“Virtue-signal about genocide?” How is opposing genocide virtue-signaling?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Are you planning on voting for the candidate who is going to be the lesser evil and minimize the harm, or are you going throw it away on a protest vote/not vote at all?

Because if you're doing the latter, you're not opposing genocide, you're abdicating your opposition by not opposing the person who wants to finish the job. Not voting against trump on the general election while professing* to oppose genocide is virtue signalling because you're explicitly and intentionally not doing the one thing that will have the most effect on the genocide.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m voting for Biden, but I’m not gonna justify a genocide to shame others to do the same. There are many reasons to give to vote for Biden, (rejoining the climate agreement, abortion rights), but apologizing for a genocide isn’t one of them.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And asking people to vote for Biden when they profess to care about genocide is not justifying genocide. Especially when they say they won't vote or are voting 3rd party as a protest vote or something to teach them a lesson.

I'm sorry you're upset about me labelling that behavior as virtue signalling, but that's what it is. You may not want to shame others for behaviors that harm the goal, but I absolutely will.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The “vote blue no matter who” crowd is actually hurting Biden, not helping. By dismissing the complaints of constituents, it places their interests in the background. It can be argued, that with the genocide occurring, it actually pushes people to not vote, or vote third party.

A campaign run on holding voters hostage doesn’t work, because it isn’t really a campaign at all; it is a campaign against your opponent rather than for your candidate.

The Democratic Party turning their backs on a huge portion of their voting populace isn’t some sort of sacrifice necessary to win the election, it is the shovel the Democratic Party is using to dig its own grave — if not this year, then in the years to come. Ignoring and stifling the voices of the people you’ve hurt, plugging your ears when they ask for accountability and telling them to take what they are given is a surefire way to cement their contempt for you, not to get them to vote for you. Strong-arming them into voting for you doesn’t work because minorities have already lost the election, and they know it. They lost the moment an establishment Democrat took the primaries again. They lose no matter what color the White House turns in January. source

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When your source is an op-ed piece, you don’t have a source. You have an opinion that isn’t even originally yours to begin with.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s not healthy to be this angry so much. Maybe a dog can help.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You lose. Thanks for playing though.

(If anyone wants to know how to tell when a propagandist is out of gas and has no argument left, it’s shit like this:

They resort to their hexbear origins and post memes.)

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I lost when I replied to your comment. It’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make for the greater good, so others don’t have to endure this inanity.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When I woke up this morning my girlfriend asked me, 'Did you sleep good?' I said 'No, I made a few mistakes.'

Steven Wright

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Probably the most astute thing you’re ever going to say here… and you didn’t even say it.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Because I typed it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

virtue signal about genocide

"Virtue signaling" is what rightwingers say about those to their left. I see it's been adopted by liberals to say about the anti-genocide left.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

virtue-signalling. : the act or practice of conspicuously displaying one's awareness of and attentiveness to political issues, matters of social and racial justice, etc., especially instead of taking effective action.

If you're going to complain about genocide then do something that will objectively make the one thing you're complaining about much worse, you're only signalling the virtues you profess to care about and not doing anything to stop it.

If you're so upset about being called a virtue signaler, maybe don't virtue signal about your vote when your vote isn't any kind of harm reduction and would actively make the problem worse?

But hey, what do I know, I just actually want to minimize genocide instead of taking my ball and going home to let a monster into the white house and make it worse. But please, keep telling me how much your type is "anti-genocide" when you're asking people to do the same thing trump and his ilk want. Kindly fuck off with that bullshit friend.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

But hey, what do I know

Only what you assume. I'm voting for Biden.

But please, keep telling me how much your type is “anti-genocide” when you’re asking people to do the same thing trump and his ilk want.

I'm not asking anyone to vote for Trump, to not vote, or to vote third party. In this very thread I've said to vote for Biden. Not that you care.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Only what you assume. I'm voting for Biden.

I'm glad to hear that. I apologize for lumping you in with those pushing the 'dont vote blue' bullshit while professing* their opposition to genocide. As I said above, that's the virtue signalling I'm talking about, and that's exactly what that behavior is.

I'm not asking anyone to vote for Trump, to not vote, or to vote third party. In this very thread I've said to vote for Biden. Not that you care.

I'm not going to spend 30 minutes to an hour on every person replies to me with what appears to be virtue signaling to not vote left to see if they're actually voting Biden. Again, I apologize for lumping you in with the rest of those. But given the quantity of that behavior it is not out of line to assume.

The only reason I ask people to vote for Biden is because I care about genocide. I want to stop the genocide as much as I can, and prevent a genocide from coming here to our shores. I have family and friends who are LGBT+, and I am afraid for their safety and lives if Trump were to be elected.

And for anybody who pretends that they care about that, while pushing behaviors that actively sabotage their stated goals, I am absolutely going to call out as virtue signalling because that's what it is. I want to see people actually take actions that align with what they say they believe, not just talk about it while sabotaging their goals through messaging pushed by their opposition as well.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

You know what would minimize genocide? If US politicians would have to face repercussions for helping in it. You do the opposite you grant the blanket check to the Biden administration and ensure them that no matter how much they support genocide, you will vote for them.

You are enabling it and you probably know it subconsciously, which is why you try to spin it the other way around because you don't want to face the reality of your actions.

The only thing the Dems care about is power, just like the Reps. If you would threaten them to loose their power, they would be forced to act on this matter. Instead you reassure them that they have nothing to fear from you. And the most absurd thing is, this will not only fuck the people in Palestine more, it will also fuck you, as nothing you want politically will matter. You are telling the Dems that they dont need to fight for your vote. You are telling them to ignore your needs, your positions, your values.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

They say “virtue-signal,” I hear “genocide justification.”