this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
465 points (95.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
70 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 55 points 4 months ago (5 children)

This is dumb. Sure Elon Musk is a dickhead. And sure Cybertruck is a dumb vehicle that only dickheads would want to have.

But I'd rather the dickheads be driving a Cybertruck than some other massive vehicle that runs on fossil fuels.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 56 points 4 months ago (1 children)

All car companies are run by evil dickheads. Most of them just make less noise than Elon.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I bet a lot have worse opinions too, they literally conspired with oil companies to avoid fixing climate change and certain companies like vw actively put in measures to cheat emissions tests.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you think spacex and starlink are making the environment a better place, I think you might be in for a surprise.

[–] kim_harding@mastodon.scot -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@Peppycito @VirtualOdour OK, so you either haven't heard about how Starlink Could Pose New Threat to the Ozone Layer https://www.sciencealert.com/satellites-like-starlink-could-pose-new-threat-to-our-healing-ozone-layer or you believe that Unicorns are real. Which is it? Nothing the Mellon Husk does is making the "environment a better place"

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

You misinterpreted my comment

[–] yuri@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago

big fucking cap

[–] servobobo@feddit.nl 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

All private cars, regardless of the fuel source, are climate disasters.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Giant metal boxes with 1.2 people on average

[–] kim_harding@mastodon.scot 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

@SpaceCowboy @return2ozma ~60% of Tesla's profits come from the sale of carbon credits, which enable other massive vehicles that run on fossil fuels to be built. E-cars are not about "saving the planet" they are pure Greenwash which is saving the motor industry.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That's more of a problem with how carbon credits are being regulated. Sure Tesla are being assholes for doing this, but it's a corporation, I don't expect them to be good guys.

But none of that changes the fact that some meathead buying a Cybertruck instead of the equivalent fossil fuel monstrosity is reducing CO2 emissions in a direct way. Spray paint the sign a Tesla corporate HQ, don't damage a vehicle which will only have the result of someone driving a fossil fuel vehicle a little longer while the damage is being fixed.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

If somehow murder became not illegal, it wouldn't make all the corpses not murderer's problem.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Literally the state of California would have lower CO2 emissions today if Tesla didn't exist.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're assuming unscrupulous companies wouldn't find another loophole or just pay a fine for going over the limit.

Don't get me wrong, Tesla is shit for helping with the loophole, but it's a degrees of bad kind of thing. Getting fossil fuel vehicles off the road does reduce carbon emissions, but Tesla was exaggerating their numbers. They should be punished for doing this, but doubling up their numbers only works if the number isn't zero.

But this is all getting away from the fact that damaging these vehicles has the net effect of people driving fossil fuel vehicles longer. It's a net harm to everyone.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Unscrupulous companies in this case referring to every car manufacturer, they wouldn't have a systemic incentive to foster an EV monopoly that is anti-consumer and actively stymies the growth of the local EV sector.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

No way, that is positively enormous.

Even carbon credit companies that do their best aren’t always (are often?) not great. e.g. trees may be planted, but:

  • locals’ may have been misappropriated for the purpose
  • you might go back five years later and find all the trees were cut down

It seems like there is some progress with that technology that… throws gravel onto beaches or something, to be broken down by waves. Really hope it’s not total BS.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 11 points 4 months ago

Tesla is synonymous with climate destruction and if you believe otherwise demonstrates that you have grossly bought into their propaganda.

[–] spicystraw@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I agree wholeheartedly