this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
342 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
3531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 65 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Because everyone is too distracted by “Apple bad” to realise how truly awful RCS is.

[–] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 45 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago (4 children)

No, but that doesn't make it good.

The whole world except a minority moved away from SMS a long time ago.

[–] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

That's great that the rest of the world moved on. That doesn't mean that those of us in locations that haven't moved on have to use the most inferior version of messaging.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I didn't say that, but it might explain why Apple didn't say much. I'm just keeping the discussion to the thread.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The only people who didn’t move on are Americans.

Nobody else uses SMS for anything else than service messages. Nobody cares about “bubble Color” in Europe, Asia or Africa

[–] bobo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

They've moved on to specific platforms, not open standards. Ultimately, that's not a good thing. Like when Twitter effectively replaced RSS for a lot of use cases.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Might be a 10thDentist take, but I could be surprised.

It's reliable in specific use cases, I'll give it that.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This makes no sense. Apple is bad, and also I want encrypted messaging. It's called Signal. It's free for iOS and Android both.

[–] Delusion6903 1 points 6 months ago

I love Signal and use it with my family which is the majority of my messaging. But I was surprised to find out the rest of my family on iPhone are missing features I have on Android. This doesn't help bring the iPhone users.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Except RCS isn’t awful at all. It’s also end to end encrypted on androids. If Apple’s participation isn’t encrypted, that’s on Apple.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 56 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Only Google’s proprietary extension has encryption. The actual industry standard specification of RCS has no encryption defined at all.

Edit: It turns out Apple have refused to use Google’s proprietary encryption implementation and are instead working with GSMA to update the RCS Universal Profile specification to finally have encryption defined and standardised so that any RCS client can handle encrypted payloads (whereas only Google Messages today can do encrypted RCS and requires other users to be exclusively using Google Messages otherwise messages are sent unencrypted).

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

I'll take that as a win!

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We will find out when they push the update.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Yes, that’s the right thing todo. My understanding was that Google went down this path and didn’t succeed, so went ahead with their own. Maybe have the other major mobile os onboard will be enough to get the carriers off their asses

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't rcs depend on having mobile data or internet access on? If I understand it right it is strictly worse than sms.

Many people just have data off most of the time and sending messages with the system app assumes things are delivered immediately and everyone easily receives them. If you forget your data is off or don't have internet for a while then you end up assuming people received stuff when they didn't.

All phone isps have basically unlimited sms for free when data is paid in huge amounts of gold.

Sms > Rcs

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not worse than SMS in any fashion. Just like SMS, RCS will tell you when your text is actually delivered. You will never assume somebody received something that they didn’t. Furthermore RCS offers read receipt functionality which will additionally let you know your message was read. SMS is not capable of that.

RCS also lets you actually send media to your contacts, like photos and videos without horribly mangling them with compression.

And as for having no data connection, your phone will fall back to SMS same as iMessages do. Which shouldn’t be at all necessary as most people have unlimited data plans and even when throttled RCS has such a small footprint you shouldn’t have any trouble.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Most people definitely DONT have unlimited data plans. In fact they are so limited and expensive that many just have the data turned off and rely on public wifi connections everywhere they go to use internet.

Nobody needs to bother with sms delivery because it just works. The only time it doesn't is if someone has their phones turned off.

Sending media is just a nice to have, not necessary.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Nope, most people do have unlimited data plans. And unless you live in some tiny, mountainous, Eastern European backwater, the plans aren’t actually that expensive either. And even if you truly are a time traveler from the year 2002 like you appear to be, and you have an incredibly limited 5GB data plan, you’ll be happy to know that even if you reach your data cap, you will still have data connectivity enough to use RCS without issue. All that happens when you “run out” of data on phone plans is you’re throttled down to a slower speed that is still more than sufficient to sent text messages over RCS.

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

My experience is that the tiny, mountainous, Eastern European backwaters are the places with the cheapest plans, and places like Germany and Canada have the worst ones.