Technology

59428 readers

3120 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

210

Elon may have a huge issue because Microsoft own the “X” trademark (futurism.com)

submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And it looks like Meta owns it in the context of social networks.

[–] TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com 19 points 1 year ago

I didn't know about the police stopping them from taking down the sign. That kinda just ties a neat bow on this perfect shitshow.

[–] flucksy_bango@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

That is embarrassingly stupid. I don't even think he's doing it on purpose unless he has some humiliation fetish or something. If I made even one mistake even close to that stupid I'd hand the reins to someone capable.

[–] echoplex21@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Excited for ThreadX

[–] hikarulsi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Xcited

[–] figment@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[–] figment@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As someone who doesn't understand trademarks, my interpretation would be that's just for the blue and white version. Is that incorrect?

[–] EnglishMobster@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I believe it would also extend to anything that can be confused with the white and blue logo in the context is social media.

I can't take the Android droid logo, make him blue, give him a squiggly antenna, and then try to make him the logo of my new phone company.

While Meta doesn't own the letter X, if the government says "People might get confused between these two marks" that's a valid reason to reject the trademark or prevent the company from calling itself that. See https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/search/likelihood-confusion:

Likelihood of confusion exists between trademarks when the marks are so similar and the goods and/or services for which they are used are so related that consumers would mistakenly believe they come from the same source. Each application is decided on its own facts, and no strict mechanical test exists for determining likelihood of confusion.

So basically it would come down to a judge deciding if the marks are too similar to each other or not.

To determine whether a likelihood of confusion exists, the marks are first examined for their similarities and differences. Note that in order to find a likelihood of confusion, the marks do not have to be identical. When marks sound alike when spoken, are visually similar, and/or create the same general commercial impression in the consuming public’s mind, the marks may be considered confusingly similar. Similarity in sound, appearance, and/or meaning may be sufficient to support a finding of likelihood of confusion, depending on the relatedness of the goods and/or services.

So I could use something similar to the Android logo to sell fishing supplies, since the likelihood of confusion is small - Android doesn't make fishing supplies. We only have an issue if I start selling phones or if Android starts selling fishing supplies.

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

No, the name "X" itself is trademarked in the context of a social media platform. The design of the logo is a different case. Though I'm not sure how solid of a case Meta has here because trademarking a single letter is a bit dubious.