There are sources given for the claims. If they are inaccurate you should remove the sources, and the claim itself if there are no good sources supporting it anymore.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you bother reading the sources, then you'll see that these aren't primary sources of anything the Russian government said. These are articles and interpretations by western analysts and think tanks. Feel free to link statements from the Russian government though.

[–] sweng@programming.dev -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again, if a source is incorrect, feel free to remove it.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Again, provide primary sources for your claims.

[–] sweng@programming.dev -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I already have sources. If you don't believe them, it's up to you to show that, not me to provode you with endless sources that you anyway will reject for some reason.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you understand the concept of a primary source?

[–] sweng@programming.dev -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

then feel free to provide some

[–] sweng@programming.dev -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm happy with the current ones, thanks.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You did not provide any primary sources, so evidently you don't understand what a primary source is. Good chat.