Technology

59428 readers

3581 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

388

YouTube Is Cracking Down on Gun Content, and 3D-Printed Gun Makers Aren't Happy (gizmodo.com)

submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

136 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Frankly in such a situation not such instructions, and not even Billy’s parents should be held primarily responsible, but bullies’ parents.

so if someone murdered you, by your logic they should get off if they say you were bullying them, thereby transferring the blame to your parents?

Y'all need to stop huffing gasoline.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, if you abuse someone morally and then they kill you, it's their right.

transferring the blame to your parents?

Parents answer for their underage children.

If they say

No, if I did. Which is what they'll say and what'll be proven in court of law.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

LOLWTF

you're deranged, you know that, right?

the murderer is the murderer. now, there may be factors involved that drove the person to murder, but they don't justify the murder. And they certainly don't get to blame the MURDER VICTIM, or their parents, for murder.

but I can see you're really fixated on this logic, please, don't let the people who bully you drive you to murdering someone, even if, apparently, you've put A LOT OF THOUGHT into this entire chain of events.

No one's going to give a fuck who bullied you once you start shooting mate.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No one’s going to give a fuck who bullied you once you start shooting mate.

Once I start shooting I wouldn't care who thinks what, no?

now, there may be factors involved that drove the person to murder, but they don’t justify the murder. And they certainly don’t get to blame the MURDER VICTIM, or their parents, for murder.

A bully is not a victim and gets what's coming to them. Same as killing in self-defense.

Anyway, the mechanism I've described improves humanity, because bullies want to bully and don't want to die, whether their victim then goes to jail or not.

A dead person or a person in jail doesn't poison the society, neither does someone who killed another in self-defense or under mental duress consciously inflicted by that person. A bully who is not dead and not in jail does poison it quite a lot.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A bully is not a victim and gets what’s coming to them. Same as killing in self-defense.

So like, Kyle Rittenhouse, you're just gonna open up on your perceived bullies and then expect right wing politicians to save you?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This comment doesn't make any sense. Also would you compare a woman's self-defense against sexual assault, for example, to Kyle Rittenhouse's case?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

you're talking with glee about opening up on your supposed bullies, Kyle. Gonna block you now, hopefully I won't get a call from the FBI one day.