this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
78 points (98.8% liked)

Liberty Hub

268 readers
1 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
78
The discourse around this is frankly unhinged (i.ibb.co)
submitted 5 months ago by LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/libertyhub@lemmy.blahaj.zone
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Even if you disagree with them, Trotskyists are not tankies, simple Marxists aren't tankies, leftists curious and exploring different theories aren't tankies, and ffs anarchists like myself are not tankies.

I feel like "tankie" indicated a very specific worldview at one time, but it's been used lately a lot to mean things like "doesn't agree with nations supporting oppression and inequity up to and including genocide" -- which is drastically at odds with how I've seen the term used in the past, no?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’ve most recently seen a .ml praising the Taliban in an lgbtq+ community.

Do you have a link to that?

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

https://lemmy.ml/comment/11454789

That might not work, here's the thread: https://lemmy.zip/post/16774498

Here's the comment:

Taliban is a very admirable group in their fight against a foreing invader. If you want people there to have a mentality that no longer condems individuals for their sexuality, they need to develop economically first. I think its naive to belive that an agricultural country set back in development many years by a foreing invasion will have any kind of progressive mindset. And no ecomic development will occur under invasion and war. So if theres any chance for a progressive mindset to come for the people there in the future, its path starts with the fight taliban did, even if they are against it themselves.

[–] RoseTintedGlasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I mod the comm and it has been removed now o7

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

I thought I had reported it when first encountered, but I'm still using the eternity client, so maybe it didn't work or something, but thank you!

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Thank you. While I get their point, saying "Taliban is a very admirable group" is definitely taking it too far, especially in that context. Reported it fwiw.

[–] RoseTintedGlasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago

I mod that comm and it has been removed o7, thanks for reporting it