this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
45 points (94.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43885 readers
1826 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why do some cars have their engines in the front and some in the back, what are the advantages and disadvantages of the two builds. And why doesn't every car have full wheel drive?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] bestusername@aussie.zone 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)
[โ€“] XTL@sopuli.xyz 20 points 5 months ago

Worst possible space efficiency and somewhat tricky routing. Lots of parts and complexity. But arguably the best performance and balance if you can deal with the cost and mass. Not uncommon, see Lamborghini, Porsche.

Pretty much obsolete at the top tier, though, since electric motors can trivially distribute the weight and drive even better.

Most supercars are AWD, find one with a mid engine and yeah

[โ€“] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

AWD adds weight, cost, and traction regardless of the engine layout.