this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
122 points (90.1% liked)

Technology

34904 readers
264 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theluddite@lemmy.ml 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I get the point they're making, and I agree with most of the piece, but I'm not sure I'd frame it as Musk's "mistakes," because he literally won the game. He became the richest person on earth. By our society's standards, that's like the very definition of success.

Our economy is like quidditch. There are all these rules for complicated gameplay, but it doesn't actually matter, because catching the snitch is the entire game. Musk is very, very bad at all the parts of the economy except for being a charlatan and a liar, which is capitalism's version of the seeker. Somehow, he's very good at that, and so he wins, even though he has literally no idea how to do anything else.

edit: fix typo!

edit2: since this struck a chord, here's my theory of Elon Musk. Tl;dr: I think his success comes from offering magical technical solutions to our political and social problems, allowing us to continue living an untenable status quo.

[–] jack55555@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Such an odd but perfect comparison lol.

[–] theluddite@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Haha thank you. Tbh I'm not much of a Harry Potter fan, so I'm not really sure where that came from.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the quidditch metaphor is particularly apt. in the game, while the seekers are chasing the golden snitch (which is mostly separate from the main game), the rest of the players - the chasers and the beaters - are busy trying to score goals by getting the quaffle through the rings at each end of the pitch. and (as we read in the books) since quidditch games can last days or even weeks, catching the snitch doesn't necessarily guarantee a win as, during that time, the opposing team may have scored enough points to offer the snitch's 150-point value.

and, while the seekers represent billionaire CEOs like musk, the beaters and seekers scoring goals represent the managers and laborers trying to make a profit.

[–] theluddite@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I literally have no idea what the rules are so any further meaning is purely a happy coincidence for which I can't take credit.

[–] fictitiousexistence@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

The world would make more sense if everything was explained via harry potter references.