this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
214 points (97.3% liked)
Technology
59358 readers
7317 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you are willing to use Signal, you already don't mind a tiny userbase, so why not use Session (or maybe Matrix) and enjoy privacy, security, AND anonymity?
Signal has always been clear that privacy!=anonymity and regards people who want both as both stupid and unusual. Its always been a weird dance to watch.
Because the ux for signal is superior and I don't care about anonymity when I'm communicating with friends and family.
The right tool for the right job, and signal is the right tool for general communication, but I wouldn't use it for my virtual pals.
Essentially, I see entirely different use cases for decentralized options like matrix, session, xmpp.
I haven’t done any Signal app recruiting in my circle of contacts (in fact, I don’t think I’ve talked to anyone about it) and I have 14 contacts that have it installed at the very least. I don’t think it would be a huge push to make Signal more prevalent.
The uphill battle is making a dent in iMessage adoption, which seems to be deeper and deeper entrenched every day.
Signal is by far much easier to get family/friends to use than Matrix or Session. Downloaded it to my parents' phones and told them this is how you contact me.
They dropped the native sms integration. IMO, that was the best tool for adoption. Make it seamless for people to move over from their native SMS messenger and people will use it. Going full closed, only signal to signal, meant I needed to use multiple messaging apps for different people. And I had to remember who is on which. It's been a headache.
Beeper is a lifesaver: https://www.beeper.com/
You can self-host if you prefer: https://github.com/beeper/self-host
Well this is interesting. I hadn't heard of Beeper before. Many years ago I used Trillion (I think it was) as a chat aggregator. It fell apart pretty quickly, but Beeper looks promising. I signed up for their wait-list. We'll see what happens.
Trillian. It's named after a character in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
What sorcery is this?
A bunch of Matrix bridges on one platform, with some extra funding. It looks cool, but isn't lifechanging. It is designed to (hopefully) make it easier to use, but if you don't care, you can set up the bridges yourself on your own matrix server.
I'm surprised it's possible to talk to most of those services without having access to trade secrets. I guess you can get that info from reverse engineering the clients, but I'd expect that approach to be very brittle and possibly subject to legal action.
Signed up for the waitlist. Thank you!
Depends on the market. In Europe SMS has become a separate, mostly read-only medium. We use it as a sort of notification channel for doctor appointments, due bills, online tickets, payment confirmations etc. Mixing this channel into a general purpose messenger app would actually hurt its adoption IMO.
A friend used it. Once he didnt had data. He only got his sms notifications as soon he got data back. It was an interesting feature, but seems a bit bugged to me.
Because you want to use it to talk to your friends, who know who you are anyway? I don't get this need to wipe yourself completely from the face of the Earth.
IMO the issue with Signal's lack of anonymity isn't that your friends know who you are; it's that Signal itself can build a graph of everybody's contacts.
I mean, yes, I understand that Facebook, Google and a bunch of other companies can get the same info, but if I'm going to switch to something to be an improvement I would ideally want it to improve all the way instead of halfway.
The concern with Session is that theyre based in Australia, a country that is in the 5 eyes, and their government passed a bill forces companies to provide a backdoor when ordered to, the company cannot deny to create this, and they can't declose that they got ordered to ether. [A great video talking about said bill] While the Session devs say their services are resilient to these threats, [see their FAQ] it's best to remain cautious.
And session removed perfect forward secrecy from the signal protocol they forked.
https://www.securemessagingapps.com/
Thanks, I've been confused about all the different messaging apps for a while now, and having a feature comparison matrix like that is helpful.
(I'd definitely be interested in other users' opinions about how accurate/reliable/unbiased the information presented is, though!)
This matrix doesn't conflict with anything I've independently read about any of the protocols listed.
It doesn't list briar, which deserves mention.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/r2h3iSA-Vac
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
SimpleX is also a good alternative, though a bit immature still.
Because the UX is horrible and they (especially matrix) have a ton of privacy/security issues that Signal doesn't have
I just checked, there are 97 Signal contacts on my phone.
Edit: It's all persons I really know
I use Session because it doesn't require a phone number.
Session is pretty slow in my experience, since it — as I understand it — works in a similar way to Tor. Images and videos are especially bad
Matrix is hella buggy, Session part of the lokinet weird ancap crypto scheme, XMPP is god tier
Briar, now that's a thingy