"This group of people is not worth immediate and drastic action, they're not worth saving," it says. Yet when it wants to destroy, liberalism is immediately present.
this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
49 points (100.0% liked)
Liberty Hub
268 readers
1 users here now
- No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
- No defending oppressive systems or organizations
- No uncivil or rude comments to other users
- Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
- No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.
These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes this is actually the correct take. The "concern" and "lashing out" by liberal institutions is all performative.
Genocide Joe will say "Israel, banning Al Jazeera and killing all those civilians is very bad" and then punish them by slightly delaying a weapons shipment. Meanwhile the ICJ will most likely put out arrest warrants while making no plans to actually execute said warrants. Even the "good" Liberal countries (Spain, Norway, and Ireland) have done nothing but pay lipservice to Palestinians.