this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
1234 points (95.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12601 readers
4275 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

regulate billion dollar corporations and then over 99% of all pollution will stop.

I'm not getting rid of my car, make billionaires and millionaires get rid of their private jets and make them stop dumping garbage into waterways

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Sure, but those regulations have to be stuff like "no selling petroleum to people for their cars". Are you ready for a carless world? I am. If you're not ready, you might find yourself opposing the necessary regulation when the time does come to regulate.

[–] Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 44 points 5 months ago (39 children)

I don't know why these discussion are often met with "if you're not ready to lose your car you're the problem" narrative.

I might not be ready to lose my car but I sure as hell am ready to lose coal based electricity, the military complex, single use plastic, billionaire who prefer to let a train derail than spend money on regulations, and a shit ton other things that wouldn't even affect my day to day life other than make it safer.

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 5 months ago

No no no, it's way more comfortable thinking that I don't have to make any big efforts because it's only the responsibility of some elite.

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, but those regulations have to be stuff like “no selling petroleum to people for their cars”. Are you ready for a carless world?

Are we just going to act like electric vehicles don't exist or that the quality of EVs would be significantly higher if the current fuel and car industry wasn't hindering their development at every turn?

I get the feeling you're just on some ego trip about how you're ready to return to nature, while the rest of the lower classes around the world aren't ready to go as far as you are, despite the fact that it's not even necessary.

Our infrastructure and our technology can change and evolve to co-exist and support the environment much better. People can retain many of their modern convivences of life while preserving nature. It will be more expensive for the wealthy at the top, more time consuming, and perhaps not exactly the same, but it can be done.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you're ready to return to nature

No, I'm trans. I need to take hormones every day or I'll want to kill myself. I wear glasses and I can't do without them. I love processed food, as long as it's vegan. Instant ramen and potato crisps make up a significant portion of my diet. I can't do without the internet. Constant information and stimulation keep the voices in my head quiet enough to be bearable. I love technology, there's no place for me in a primitive world. I'd die.

Our infrastructure and our technology can change and evolve to co-exist and support the environment much better.

I know. And cars aren't the way. Cars are destructive to communities, they kill people with startling regularity, and even when they're working properly on an electric battery they release PM10 pollution that gives kids asthma and allergies, and they stunt cognitive development for the people inside them.

The answer is public transit and bicycles. We don't need to return to monke, we need to build cross continental high speed rail. The technologies to make our lives better exist and they're not cars. Not even electric cars.

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My apologies for assuming then. It genuinely came off as pretentious and I'm sorry for misunderstanding.

I also wasn't aware of the side effects and dangers that even EVs had. I agree that public transit should be invested in more, but I at least thought using EVs as a transition phase would help.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Electric cars are only an effective solution if we're waiting around for capitalism to fix our problems. Which we shouldn't be doing. If the government is actually putting in an effort, then it's more cost effective and faster to build trains and trams and rail. Electric cars let people do a little more good in a world where nobody else is. But they're not the future, not a future we can look forward to. The EVs of the future are trains, bicycles, trams, buses, scooters, skateboards, fire engines, and ambulances.

Living carfree makes my life better. But people don't realise that. I say "you better be ready like me", and you think I'm an anprim. Nah, I love technology. And I also like getting exercise when I go places like nature intended. I like the vitamin D, I like the cortisol, I like the lack of guilt. I like bringing my bike on the train and playing with my phone on the way. I like never needing to seriously worry about parking. I like knowing I'm not part of the problem. And I really like knowing that no matter how badly I fuck up, I'll never get someone else killed through carelessness.

The future is awesome! Walkable neighbourhoods and a public transit system the government actually invests are amazing. I'm very lucky to live somewhere that both of those are true. It's great in the future, come over here!

But psychologically, people are stubborn. They're scared of change. They'll resist it. People don't know what's good for them, they only know what's comfortable. So come join us in the future now, don't wait, and don't risk the possibility that you'll end up an old fart holding the human race back with your reliance on the technology of the past.

[–] gimsy@feddit.it 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yes and stop selling bullshit electric vehicles, there is already the solution: public transport

Electric vehicles are another boost to the super rich car industry

[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I can't use public transit. So I guess if there's no cars, I'll be stuck at my house forever.

[–] gimsy@feddit.it 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's exactly the problem, you should be able to

[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

That’s exactly the problem, you should be able to

I'm disabled in several ways, I don't want to talk about it.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Nobody said "no cars". I'd like to see much fewer cars, and public transport that almost everyone can use.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 5 months ago

Wow. Such a martyr. Willing to stay at home forever because they have been told individual cars have an impact towards climate change that you don't believe in.

People would rather the world burn than be inconvenienced even a little.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately we do still need cars. Mostly for things like farm use and last mile transportation. Having everyone live in a city near a train line is a great idea but you it definitely won't happen. Electric cars is the compromise we need to make with people in rural areas

[–] gimsy@feddit.it 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, but that is not the target group electric cars are targeting, see all Tesla models

Including "cyber truck" (always makes me chuckle to think that they are really trying to sell that crap)

Edit:typos

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah Elon musk is a cuck and I'm not advocating for any specific manufacturer but realistically we will need some cars in the future no matter what. So I'd rather them be electric