this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
953 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1493 readers
153 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
953
The Google AI isn’t hallucinating about glue in pizza, it’s just over indexing an 11 year old Reddit post by a dude named fucksmith. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 7 months ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/techtakes@awful.systems
254 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Source

I see Google's deal with Reddit is going just great...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it's not darwinism, what you're playing with is casual eugenics (you clearly don't value life of certain – arbitrarily chosen – people, and are fine with them suffering harm); don't. there's nothing good waiting for you on that path.

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml -5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What makes it arbitrary.

[–] self@awful.systems 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

this is you:

I’ll usually debate people as well, but not those who resort to a logic fallacy as boring as ad hominem for lack of an argument. Seeya.

we don’t need your debatebro ass here. though now that the flood of random posters is mostly over, we also don’t need more gravely unfunny lol monkeyspork random reddit posts either

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 6 points 7 months ago

…and i told that person that nothing good is waiting on that path.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 6 points 7 months ago

i don't understand the question – are you asking what makes arbitrary the rule “people who suffered harm because they followed an advice on the internet do not deserve to survive” ?