this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
670 points (98.0% liked)

People Twitter

5396 readers
608 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"We've"? You may internalize whatever you'd like, but I don't think judging sex scenes by necessary or unnecessary is even a realistic metric at all. Movies are an art form. That's like saying, Renoir had to many extra people in his paintings, not all of them were necessary. I personally prefer more explicit sex scenes woven into movies about intimate relationships and I think watching something like a tiger disembowling someone is in my opinion less than necessary. Just show the tiger and then maybe a body bag or something. But that's completely just a personal preference, no we shit.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I disagree that a lot of society has "internalized this". Perhaps Lemmy and other social media bubbles may lead you to believe this, but the sample sizes are ridiculously skewed. It's like saying a lot of people love Arch Linux. Well, yeah, on Lemmy they do! But that's not the real world. I just think we statements broadcast to a bunch of strangers on the internet are a bad idea in general.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas