this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
67 points (81.9% liked)

Technology

59428 readers
2852 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Temperche@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Would need human curation to select the best websites in each field.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Yahoo back in the day with its categories, and later Fazed.net with curated links was a nice time for a while

[–] TrumpetX@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

Pay to play was the problem there. I had the highest ranking joke page on webcrawler for a stint, but Yahoo wanted $500 to put me on top. My 15 year old self was not interested.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That’s pretty much what all of the site aggregators were. I ran a couple of communities on yahoo and some other sites. There were also services like Archie, gopher, and wais, and I am pretty sure my Usenet client had some searching on it (it might have been emacs - I can’t remember anymore). I remember when Google debuted on Stanford.edu/google and realized that everything was about to change.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

It worked because the web was much smaller.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Or AI to rank and filter out the things you need based on public indexing. Preferably there'd be several AI assistants to choose from. Things seem to be moving in that direction anyway.

[–] sem@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that personalization of search results tends to information bubbles. That is the reason why I prefer DDG over Google.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

While this is true (and a problem with current engines like Google), I could see having a local LLM doing the filtering for you based on your own criteria. Then you could do a wide-open search as needed, or with minimal filtering, etc.

When I'm searching for technical stuff (Android rom, Linux commands/how it works), it would be really helpful to have some really capable filtering mechanisms that have learned.

When I want to find something from a headline, then it needs to be mostly open (well, maybe filtering out The Weekly World News).

But it really needs to be done by my own instance of an LLM/AI, not something controlled elsewhere.

[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Ai won't help since it'll be programmed to show only what it's owners want us to see

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

With your own customization, done locally.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 1 points 6 months ago

Given that the indices are not available locally, it’d be difficult for your own algorithm of any sort, AI or otherwise, to rank items higher/lower than others.