this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
88 points (94.9% liked)

Gaming

19947 readers
71 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I understand them both well enough to implement them in my projects. I don't see why people are anything other than excited about the implementation of more capable AI in games. Are these initial implementations garbage? Probably, but that's just growing pains, So what is it about gen AI that actually bothers people?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So what is it about gen AI that actually bothers people?

It's being used corporate suits to replace talented artists, writers, programmers, and voice actors and make their shareholders happy. Although this is Ubisoft, so they already making substandard products anyway. I mean, how do you fuck up the login system for your online table top games as much as they did?

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

So I work in a creative industry (video production), and have for like three decades. If A.I. can do a lot of the work I do just as well, no part of me wants to continue to do that work. Most of what I get paid for is not "art" in the sense that it expresses some fundamental drive in me. But I do love collaborating with A.I.s to create things that I would've never been able to do on my own (and that A.I. would have never been able to do without me). This is where things are going, and I totally grant that greedy corpos doing greedy corpo shit is not to be lauded. But that's an Ubisoft problem, not a gen AI problem. People are the issue with A.I.