this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
42 points (95.7% liked)

Australia

3611 readers
115 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What about cloud based SAAS?

Company out of funds. Has to pull back offerings. Closes that software.

This law would force them to somehow keep it operating.

That would be like telling the local bakery he has to keep baking pies each morning, even though he's gone broke.

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

SAAS isn't a one-off purchase, it's a rental with ongoing rental fees.

The intention of the wording of the petition is that it only covers "purchased" items. If a customer is given the impression that they are buying something then it should act like any other bought item. If they are given the impression they are renting something then it's out of scope, that's expected to abruptly die one day.

effectively withdrawing customers’ rights under the Australian Consumer Law to ownership and undisturbed possession of their purchased goods

^ it's a bit subtle if you're not familiar with the campaigns' language.

This means other people will misinterpret it too :(

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately yes, as I am all for the petition, as you've clarified it. I'll sign. But, it's a shame that was not made clearer.

With the amount of people employed in the SAAS world, that could scare them. With more clarity, it might have more signatures.

Thanks for the answer.

[–] ky56@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I suppose one interpretation is that companies can no longer use "buy" and will have to use "rent" for that transaction.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

If there's a one time cost, it's a buy. But my business services, I pay monthly. That's a subscription.